0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Kramer on June 28, 2011, 01:26:19 PMQuote from: sirs on June 28, 2011, 01:14:52 PMBut Bt doesn't agree with that addiction analogy. Thinks its ridiculous, in fact maybe he's one of them!Didn't you say at one time that the military was one of your bigger customers?And wasn't Sirs complaining about all the paperwork he has to fill out for his patients paid for by the govt?
Quote from: sirs on June 28, 2011, 01:14:52 PMBut Bt doesn't agree with that addiction analogy. Thinks its ridiculous, in fact maybe he's one of them!
But Bt doesn't agree with that addiction analogy. Thinks its ridiculous, in fact
I am sure that the military could be cut as well and I am OK with that.
Quote from: BT on June 28, 2011, 02:27:29 PMQuote from: Kramer on June 28, 2011, 01:26:19 PMQuote from: sirs on June 28, 2011, 01:14:52 PMBut Bt doesn't agree with that addiction analogy. Thinks its ridiculous, in fact maybe he's one of them!Didn't you say at one time that the military was one of your bigger customers?And wasn't Sirs complaining about all the paperwork he has to fill out for his patients paid for by the govt?yes the military is a customer of mine. spending needs to be cut. I am sure that the military could be cut as well and I am OK with that.
Quote from: Kramer on June 28, 2011, 02:34:25 PMQuote from: BT on June 28, 2011, 02:27:29 PMQuote from: Kramer on June 28, 2011, 01:26:19 PMQuote from: sirs on June 28, 2011, 01:14:52 PMBut Bt doesn't agree with that addiction analogy. Thinks its ridiculous, in fact maybe he's one of them!Didn't you say at one time that the military was one of your bigger customers?And wasn't Sirs complaining about all the paperwork he has to fill out for his patients paid for by the govt?yes the military is a customer of mine. spending needs to be cut. I am sure that the military could be cut as well and I am OK with that.So you are comfortable with CU pointing out that needle in your arm?
How is a non government entity, who supports decreased spending to his own constituents, make him an addict?? Inquiring minds, and all that
Actually, the analogy is dead on. Its your transparent attempt to twist it into something it's not, as ridiculous
The anlogy concerned the junky as the Government, and spending as the drug. The spending is not by the likes of Kramer, thus the ongoing ridiculous flaw to your tactic
Quote from: sirs on June 28, 2011, 04:02:31 PMThe anlogy concerned the junky as the Government, and spending as the drug. The spending is not by the likes of Kramer, thus the ongoing ridiculous flaw to your tacticYou'll have to take that up with Kramer. He seemed to think the junky was me. http://debategate.com/new3dhs/index.php?topic=15408.msg127234#msg127234
Quote from: sirs on June 28, 2011, 04:02:31 PMThe anlogy concerned the junky as the Government, and spending as the drug. The spending is not by the likes of Kramer, thus the ongoing ridiculous flaw to your tacticYou'll have to take that up with Kramer. He seemed to think the junky was me.