Jim DeMint is absolutely correct

[Kramer]

But Bt doesn't agree with that addiction analogy.  Thinks its ridiculous, in fact     

maybe he's one of them!

Didn't you say at one time that the military was one of your bigger customers?

And wasn't Sirs complaining about all the paperwork he has to fill out for his patients paid for by the govt?

yes the military is a customer of mine. spending needs to be cut. I am sure that the military could be cut as well and I am OK with that.

[Christians4LessGvt]

I am sure that the military could be cut as well and I am OK with that.

yeah....what the hell are we doing in Libya?

[sirs]

Very good question.......where's the MSM on that one?

[BT]

But Bt doesn't agree with that addiction analogy.  Thinks its ridiculous, in fact     

maybe he's one of them!

Didn't you say at one time that the military was one of your bigger customers?

And wasn't Sirs complaining about all the paperwork he has to fill out for his patients paid for by the govt?

yes the military is a customer of mine. spending needs to be cut. I am sure that the military could be cut as well and I am OK with that.

So you are comfortable with CU pointing out that needle in your arm?

[sirs]

How is a non government entity, who supports decreased spending to his own constituents, make him an addict??  Inquiring minds, and all that     

[Kramer]

But Bt doesn't agree with that addiction analogy.  Thinks its ridiculous, in fact     

maybe he's one of them!

Didn't you say at one time that the military was one of your bigger customers?

And wasn't Sirs complaining about all the paperwork he has to fill out for his patients paid for by the govt?

yes the military is a customer of mine. spending needs to be cut. I am sure that the military could be cut as well and I am OK with that.

So you are comfortable with CU pointing out that needle in your arm?

Doesn't bother me at all. If not for people like me that support military operations a lot of people would get killed. Still spending needs to be cut.

[BT]

How is a non government entity, who supports decreased spending to his own constituents, make him an addict??  Inquiring minds, and all that     

You'll have to ask CU that one. I thought the analogy was ridiculous. Remember?

[sirs]

Actually, the analogy is dead on.  Its your transparent attempt to twist it into something it's not, as ridiculous

[BT]

Actually, the analogy is dead on.  Its your transparent attempt to twist it into something it's not, as ridiculous

How so? The analogy concerned govt spending. I simply localized the recipients of some of that largesse.

Personally I'm pretty sure Kramer provides a value added product at a fair price. And I don't have a problem with that.

[sirs]

The anlogy concerned the junky as the Government, and spending as the drug.  The spending is not by the likes of Kramer, thus the ongoing ridiculous flaw to your tactic

[BT]

The anlogy concerned the junky as the Government, and spending as the drug.  The spending is not by the likes of Kramer, thus the ongoing ridiculous flaw to your tactic

You'll have to take that up with Kramer. He seemed to think the junky was me.
http://debategate.com/new3dhs/index.php?topic=15408.msg127234#msg127234

[Kramer]

The anlogy concerned the junky as the Government, and spending as the drug.  The spending is not by the likes of Kramer, thus the ongoing ridiculous flaw to your tactic

You'll have to take that up with Kramer. He seemed to think the junky was me.
http://debategate.com/new3dhs/index.php?topic=15408.msg127234#msg127234

I said maybe as in maybe you are and maybe you aren't -- I don't know, are you?

[sirs]

The anlogy concerned the junky as the Government, and spending as the drug.  The spending is not by the likes of Kramer, thus the ongoing ridiculous flaw to your tactic

You'll have to take that up with Kramer. He seemed to think the junky was me.

I don't have to take up anything with anyone.  I merely demonstrated where your continuos ridiculous flaw kept perpetuating itself

[BT]

You'll have to take that up with Sirs. He apparently is the definer of analogies.

[sirs]

Your misrepresentations of me, have no ceiling, do they?