Black Parents Condone Teaching Kids to be Dishonest

[BT]

The story did not say anything about the parents reaction to the cheating scandal other than the fact that apparently there is a lot of uncertainty as to what will happen to their neighborhood school.

The absence of a denouncing  statement does not equate to condoning.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Results on a standardized test are one thing: improvement observed by parents in better reading abilities are another, different, thing. Not all students results were augmented by teachers or principals; not all parents commented on their child's progress.

Cheating on test results by teachers does not mean in any way that all students did not learn what they were expected to learn. Some may have learned more and not all tests were fudged.

While it is clear that teachers should not have changed answers and scores, it is not necessarily true that every student was in some way cheated.

I suggest that teachers were not "teaching kids to be dishonest", as it was obviously not a part of the plan to tell students that cheating had been done on their behalf. To be taught dishonesty, you have to be aware that it occurred.

[Kramer]

The story did not say anything about the parents reaction to the cheating scandal other than the fact that apparently there is a lot of uncertainty as to what will happen to their neighborhood school.

The absence of a denouncing  statement does not equate to condoning.

I usually use several factors in making a decision and maybe I'm wrong but I doubt it.

From my observations black people generally rally behind and come to the defense of other black people because they seem to believe non-black people have it out for blacks in general. That is why most voted for Obama solely on his blackness and many rooted for OJ. Had OJ killed his black wife then all bets would be off but sense his wife was white they backed a guilty OJ. This is just the way it happens to be and anybody with a brain should be able to see it. Does this mean that 100% of the time this in the case -- no -- but it is very common; too common indeed. There is a slight similarity between black people doing this and liberal Democrats too. Democrats rally behind perverts for as long as they can get away with it and then when it's become far too obvious that the pervert is a pervert then they abandon them. Case in point, The Wiener, and to a larger extent Bill Clinton, and Johnny Boy Edwards.

[BT]

So it's a black thing?
Gotcha

[Xavier_Onassis]

Kramer never passes up an opportunity to slander Black people.

Black people who annoy other Black people or White people he disagrees with are the only exceptions.

[Kramer]

So it's a black thing?
Gotcha

nope, it's a white thing, just ask Al & Jesse.

[BT]

You might as well shout fucking niggers and be done with it.

[Kramer]

You might as well shout fucking niggers and be done with it.

that seems kinda harsh.

[Plane]

Would it be funny now if it turned out that Quinnie Cook-Richardson were caucasion?

Or have we gone totally past the point at which anything can be funny?

[kimba1]

Obama's blackness?

You seem to forget he was called not black from the black community at those times due to the fact he had no African-American roots.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Most Black people think of Obama as Black. There is no more consensus among Black Americans than White ones, but most of those in both groups think of anyone who is raised here is an American.

[BT]

Would it be funny now if it turned out that Quinnie Cook-Richardson were caucasion?

Or have we gone totally past the point at which anything can be funny?

She very well could be.

[Kramer]

Would it be funny now if it turned out that Quinnie Cook-Richardson were caucasion?

Or have we gone totally past the point at which anything can be funny?

http://atlantanaturalhair.com/profile/QuinnieCookRichardson

[Xavier_Onassis]

What would be even funnier would be if Kramer were Black.

[Kramer]

What would be even funnier would be if Kramer were Black.

I am.