<<And in this principal , what are the proper limits on opinions a black skinned person may hold?
<< Is it shamefull for a white skinned person to be a traitor to his race, perhaps by voting or expressing opinions as if the skin color of a canadate were not a primary consideration?...or by being a liberal? No white people other than Jews should be liberals and black Jews really really can't be conservative, they are under a double geas.>>
Most people fall quite clearly into groups. Groups have group interests, and unfortunately they also have enemies. Sowell and Cain fall into the group known as "blacks." The group interest of the blacks is to work the entire group out from under the cumulative effects of centuries of racism, slavery, exploitation and Jim Crow. The group enemy of the blacks is white racism in general and the GOP in particular, and even more particularly the conservative wing of the GOP.
Just as Americans are supposed to work for the good of America and not join al Qaeda, the enemy of America, so it is with other groups, the blacks for instance: members of the black community are supposed to work for the good of the black community and not join the white racist enemies of the black people, the GOP and the conservatives in particular. The words for a black man who turns his back on his own people to support their enemies and oppressors are: Uncle Tom.
The word for a Norwegian who betrays the Norwegian people to curry favour with their enemy, Nazi Germany is, quisling. By the same insane arguments that "prove" that I am a "racist" for calling out an Uncle Tom, quislings' defenders could argue that I have assigned them a proper role to play as Norwegians and have so stereotyped Norwegians by their ethnicity that I fail to respect any of them who think outside the box. Thus my calling out a quisling is simply displaying anti-Norwegian racism.
What kind of craziness is this? You want to continue playing with it, be my guest - - you're on your own with it.
