Author Topic: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win  (Read 4685 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BSB

  • Guest
Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« on: November 30, 2011, 03:56:44 AM »
Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies

When the Patriots staff sits down to draw up a game plan against an opponent they have at their disposal information, reports, tape, on the skills and abilities of that teams individual players, and how that opponent utilizes them. The formations they use, recent trends, successes, failures, injury report, and so forth. For example, this weekend they are playing the Colts, the Colts as they are right now. Not the historical Colts of Johnny U. or Payton Manning, but this Colt team, with its players, and its skills and weaknesses.

When we engage an enemy we do the same thing, if we want to be successful that is. In this war against global terrorists we identify the players, their skills, and how they are being utilized right now. We gather intelligence, watch as things shift, try and stay as much on top of it as we can. We are not fighting some monolithic enemy. We are fighting a very complicated, wide spread, ever changing multiplicity of people, particulars, events, formats, societies, beliefes, economies, geographies, etc. etc.

If we want to lose, the best thing to do would be see them as one, Islamonazies, and respond accordingly.


BSB

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2011, 12:03:00 PM »
That is true. We cannot fight "Islam". It does little good to call them all "islamonazis" and go ape on all disagreements we have with Muslims.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11096
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2011, 05:23:53 PM »
That is true. We cannot fight "Islam". It does little good to call them all "islamonazis" and go ape on all disagreements we have with Muslims.

It also does little good to try and equate Islamonazis with Islam as well.  Contrary to popular delusional leftist spin, we're not at war with Islam.  Never have been


« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 06:02:24 PM by sirs »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2011, 05:52:14 PM »
That is true. We cannot fight "Islam". It does little good to call them all "islamonazis" and go ape on all disagreements we have with Muslims.



Do you belive that there is no distinction to be made between peacefull people of Islam and people of Islam who want to go to war?

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2011, 06:29:34 PM »
I believe that there must be a distinction, but that it is not being properly made.

Calling them "Islamonazis" is none too clever and not accurate. Similar to making up a term like 'Christocapitalists". or "Petroleosatanists".

"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2011, 06:45:35 PM »
If the term fits and IS accurate, what's the problem?  Let's focus on the small minority of folks we are at war with vs the red herring deflection of all of Islam, or all of Capitalists, or all of Petreleolists, whoever they are      ::)
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2011, 08:27:06 PM »
The term is insulting and obnoxious. It is like calling the Germans the Huns or referring to Britain and 'perfidious Albion". It does not define the opposition, it is just a way of vilifying the opposition.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2011, 08:33:05 PM »
Alot of accurate terms can be considered obnoxious, by those that don't agree.  Doesn't make them less accurate, I'm afraid
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2011, 08:38:26 PM »
Insulting the enemy does not make him weaker. The term "Islamonazi" is insulting to Muslims, like calling Americans "capitalist running dogs", or the Russians "godless Communists".

If you call the same people "Muslim fundamentalists" that is an adequate description.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2011, 08:46:45 PM »
Sorry, I have no problem insulting anyone that wants to target and kill innocent men, women, and children, because we dare to influence others from looking away from their prescious mutated religious ways.  In fact there are far more appropriate yet harsher terms I could apply, but Islamonazis will suffice for now

and hint, that doesn't equate to all of Muslim people.  Its specific to Islamic militants/terrorists,....just in case you were going to try to pull out "those Muslims" card.  That's the difference from your flawed use of "Americans" as "Capitalist running dogs"
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16140
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2011, 08:52:50 PM »
How would you differentiate between a Muslim and an Islamonazi if you passed them on the street?

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2011, 08:55:33 PM »
How would you differentiate between a Muslim and an Islamonazi if you passed them on the street?

  The Islamonatzi is the one that knifed you.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #13 on: December 01, 2011, 08:59:38 PM »
Insulting the enemy does not make him weaker. The term "Islamonazi" is insulting to Muslims, like calling Americans "capitalist running dogs", or the Russians "godless Communists".

If you call the same people "Muslim fundamentalists" that is an adequate description.

I always thought that "capitalist running dogs", sounded very funny, perhaps it lost something in translation.

The ones we really want to focus negative attention on are the violent ones , do you consider Islam to be fundamentaly violent? If you don't then "Muslim fundamentalists" might be a term with the wrong focus.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16140
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Belichick Vs. The Islamonazies? Not if We want to Win
« Reply #14 on: December 01, 2011, 09:53:23 PM »
How would you differentiate between a Muslim and an Islamonazi if you passed them on the street?

  The Islamonatzi is the one that knifed you.

So an action on their part is required for the purposes of correct labeling?