Author Topic: Presidential debate  (Read 850 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Presidential debate
« on: December 15, 2011, 10:21:05 PM »
Observations

Perry says he wants to be the Tim Tebow of the caucus

It just dawned on me that Romney has less government experience than Obama did when he ran for office. And far less than Palin.


Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Presidential debate
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2011, 11:06:08 PM »
  How long was Romney Govenor?

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Presidential debate
« Reply #2 on: December 15, 2011, 11:12:28 PM »
4 years

Obama had 6 in the Il Senate and 2 in the US Senate i think. Palin had more than Obama

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Presidential debate
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2011, 12:34:40 AM »
Alaska is hardly a difficult chore to govern. The state pays the people oil royalties, and taxes are very low. Palin's experience in Alaska can hardly be compared to Obama's i Illinois or Romney's in Massachusetts.

Obama has more experience at being President than all the rest of the GOP hopefuls combined. No one understand the job until they have served.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Presidential debate
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2011, 01:17:41 AM »
Being governor of a state simply means that they are the chief executive of a state. The execute laws passed by the legislature and present a budget to the legislature. The size of the state in population or land area is immaterial. Staffing to execute your job is scalable to the task. It is a management job. Period.



Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Presidential debate
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2011, 06:05:09 AM »
Congressmen Senators and Govenors are running.

Mayors and Businessmen and Generals have run.

What job in government or out is the best training for a President?

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Presidential debate
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2011, 12:26:19 PM »
What job in government or out is the best training for a President?

===========================================
It COULD BE being an active Vice President. I thought Al Gore was quite well trained. Dick Cheney, on the other hand, was a hateful sadist when he entered and even more hateful when he left.

I would personally favor Hillary Clinton running as the Democratic candidate at this point. Not because Obama has done so poorly, but because Hillary would serve to quash all the animosity that has occurred during the present administration. I doubt that McConnell would again state that his goal was to see to it that she was also a one-term president.

I think it would cause the greatest possible surge in the Wall Street, and that would restore optimism to this country. Costa Rica has two very useful laws (1) a president cannot directly succeed himself, and (2) a president cannot campaign while in office.  This has resulted in frequent exchanges of power and by an large, everyone agrees that Costa Rica is among the most democratic and best governed countries on Earth.

As I have said before, as a rule, a second term is usually worse than a first term. This was certainly true of Juniorbush.
However, none of the possible Republican prospects are worth a damn. Romney is marginally better than Gingrich. Bachmann, each for different reasons. Perry and Santorum are probably less likely but just as awful as the Newtster. Paul would be a total disaster.

Of course, there is zero chance that the Democrats will change candidates. It violates two centuries of tradition.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."