Author Topic: So why the carrier?  (Read 1003 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
So why the carrier?
« on: February 26, 2012, 04:03:56 AM »
Wyoming House advances doomsday bill

   
By JEREMY PELZER Star-Tribune capital bureau | Posted: Friday, February 24, 2012 6:00 pm | (32) Comments


CHEYENNE — State representatives on Friday advanced legislation to launch a study into what Wyoming should do in the event of a complete economic or political collapse in the United States.

House Bill 85 passed on first reading by a voice vote. It would create a state-run government continuity task force, which would study and prepare Wyoming for potential catastrophes, from disruptions in food and energy supplies to a complete meltdown of the federal government.

The task force would look at the feasibility of

Wyoming issuing its own alternative currency, if needed. And House members approved an amendment Friday by state Rep. Kermit Brown, R-Laramie, to have the task force also examine conditions under which Wyoming would need to implement its own military draft, raise a standing army, and acquire strike aircraft and an aircraft carrier.

The bill’s sponsor, state Rep. David Miller, R-Riverton, has said he doesn’t anticipate any major crises hitting America anytime soon. But with the national debt exceeding $15 trillion and protest movements growing around the country, Miller said Wyoming — which has a comparatively good economy and sound state finances — needs to make sure it’s protected should any unexpected emergency hit the U.S.

Several House members spoke in favor of the legislation, saying there was no harm in preparing for the worst.

“I don’t think there’s anyone in this room today what would come up here and say that this country is in good shape, that the world is stable and in good shape — because that is clearly not the case,” state Rep. Lorraine Quarberg, R-Thermopolis, said. “To put your head in the sand and think that nothing bad’s going to happen, and that we have no obligation to the citizens of the state of Wyoming to at least have the discussion, is not healthy.”

Wyoming’s Department of Homeland Security already has a statewide crisis management plan, but it doesn’t cover what the state should do in the event of an extreme nationwide political or economic collapse. In recent years, lawmakers in at least six states have introduced legislation to create a state currency, all unsuccessfully.

The task force would include state lawmakers, the director of the Wyoming Department of Homeland Security, the Wyoming attorney general and the Wyoming National Guard’s adjutant general, among others.

The bill must pass two more House votes before it would head to the Senate for consideration. The original bill appropriated $32,000 for the task force, though the Joint Appropriations Committee slashed that number in half earlier this week.

University of Wyoming political science professor Jim King said the potential for a complete unraveling of the U.S. government and economy is “astronomically remote” in the foreseeable future.

But King noted that the federal government set up a Continuity of Government Commission in 2002, of which former U.S. Sen. Al Simpson, R-Wyo., was co-chairman. However, King said he didn’t know of any states that had established a similar board.

Read more: http://trib.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/wyoming-house-advances-doomsday-bill/article_af6e1b2b-0ca4-553f-85e9-92c0f58c00bd.html#ixzz1nTNpbPt6
« Last Edit: February 26, 2012, 04:10:10 AM by BT »

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11153
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2012, 01:21:59 PM »
quite interesting......
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8032
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2012, 01:34:06 AM »
we had something like this in san francisco and the end result was a finding that stated totally unprepared for disaster. after 3 years nothing has changed still. I think thier solution was never do a study like that again.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2012, 02:16:12 AM »
I was curious because the last time i looked Wyoming was landlocked.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2012, 02:44:06 AM »
Global Warming
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16143
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2012, 02:50:09 AM »
perhaps, doubtful, but perhaps.


Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2012, 07:01:28 AM »
I wonder where Wyoming might park its aircraft carrier.

It seems as though these people are not working with a full deck.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11153
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2012, 08:00:53 AM »
It seems as though these people are not working with a full deck.

uh no that would be Washington DC...
print print print print print print
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8032
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2012, 10:29:03 AM »
maybe thiers a law that mat require a carrier like hawaii interstate highway

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2012, 11:25:11 AM »
Obviously, an Interstate highway in Hawaii is impossible. However, Hawaiian DO pay for Interstate highways and Oahu is seriously congested: nearly every place in this rather small island is urbanized that is not a mountain or a park. There is certainly a need for expressways around Honolulu, where traffic is heavy and progress is always slow. It takes a minimum of 45 minutes between the airport and Waikiki.

Oahu has a great bus system, by the way. The drivers are friendly and courteous, and the system goes everywhere. But it is slow because of the traffic. With your medicare card, it costs only a dollar.

I can see where H-1 and H-2 are much needed highways, even if they will never reach the mainland.

=================================
On the other hand, I don't see where an aircraft carrier is needed to defend Wyoming.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8032
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2012, 11:56:36 AM »
the interstate tag was needed for federal funding


http://geography.about.com/library/faq/blqzhawaiiinterstates.htm

I`m using that example as a possible reason the need for a carrier. some law maybe in place that require it.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: So why the carrier?
« Reply #11 on: February 29, 2012, 12:28:59 AM »