And you do that again, and again, and again, demading a verbatim posting of your confession, when I've demonstrated again, and again, and again, what you were referencing. Not a damn court of law, Bt. Simply reading comprehension. I had MADE my point clearly before Cu even posted. HIS reference had the dog on the roof, and YOUR response was clearly bypassing what I had said, in answering your question, and implying what Cu said, which included dogs on roofs, was my reason for posting, "yeah. I was wondering why Sirs started the thread".
Why do you do this?? Why can't you simply respond to my posts with out some nefarious redirection of what I've said, or trying to seek out what my nefarious attempt supposedly is. Be clear, if you're not sure, and leave the erroneous implications for someone else who has far more patience
OR
If you think I'm reading you wrong, speak up and make it clear. Say something along the lines of "Sirs, sorry if you're reading me wrong. I didn't mean to imply you were ....insert whatever the confusion is here....... If you didn't mean "x", what did you mean?"
Let's try to debate issues, rather than throw rocks at each other