It would have been a major error for the US president to try to keep Mubarak in office. President Obama didprecisely the right thing. Of course, he did not put Morsi in office, nor should any US president be able to do so, any more than some Egyptian president should put a US president in office and support him.
It's not nearly as "black and white" as you pretend or really just do not undertsand.
The US should and does....yes even Saint Obama...push American interests in these scenarios.
The US can not "not be involved" and just allow our enemies to influence situations.
Iran is trying to influence who runs Syria....
why should they, China, and Russia be the only one that have influence?
And we should sit by and allow only our enemies/competition to influence who runs countries?
You pretend "we shouldn't be involved" in picking other countries leaders...
But you had no problem with the US (Obama) basically making the decision Khadfi would
not lead the people of Libya any longer. We and our allies made that decision for Libyans.
I am sure there were Libyans that wanted to be able to choose Khadfi, but we (Obama)
did not allow them that choice.