Grant wrote a book about his life and times and presidency,Lincon did not , is there a rational reason for this?
-==========================================================
Of course there is.
Grant was destitute and dying of cancer and wrote his autobiography to support his wife after his death. Grant was a very good writer. Lincoln was assassinated before he had a chance to write anything. Odds are that had he lived, his wife would have made it very difficult for Lincoln to have written anything. Mary Todd Lincoln was barking mad.
Jesus chose the time and place of his death. he could have written his Gospel and THEN done his crucifixion thing. He was in his 30's. Lincoln was in his 60's.
Jesus could certainly have saved more souls had his message been clearer. None of the four Gospels is more than a spotty set of memoirs and there are contradictions between them. We still do not know the exact year. month or day of his birth, though both the Jews and the Romans kept precise records of such things.
More people have heard of Coca-Cola than have heard of Jesus. Coca-Cola makes no claims to be divine or to be omnipotent, and in less than 125 years, it is better known than Jesus.
Most of Europe was converted to Christianity by war, conquest and violence,and rather a few really stupid legends.
If Jesus had had a more effective message, no one would have paid much attention to Mohammad.
As for saying that Jesus should have had a gun, I was simply poking fun at your stupid crap about how guns make everyone safer.
