Elizabeth Warren

[Plane]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/24/elizabeth-warren-science-fund_n_6044556.html


Has done something I like!


If one is patient , even the most unlikely people will do something praiseworthy.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Elizabeth Warren is very talented and would make an excellent president.

[Plane]

  Do you think she might get the Native American votes?

[Xavier_Onassis]

She might, or might not. I would say, that as a Democrat, she would almost certainly get a majority. Democrats always do.
That is not a major issue, though.

[Plane]

  If voters must ID themselves positively , more Democrats than Republicans will fail to do so.

   Because Democrats are uniformly less intelligent.

[Xavier_Onassis]

That is a crock.

There are lots of stupid people of every political persuasion, and voting for Elizabeth Warren, who opposed the average person being ripped off by corporations is a wise decision.

[Plane]

  I don't know her well, but from what I have seen so far , I don't think she is depending on the well informed voter.

[Xavier_Onassis]

No politician depends on the well informed voter. No politician seeks to inform the voters of anything useful. They do not do this because it gets far kore votes to lambaste the opposition with dumbassed negative ads. I have not seen Elizabeth Warren doing this, though.

[Plane]

  You have a point , but I really think that the Republicans who insult the intelligence of the voter suffer.

    Democrats seem highly tolerant of such insult.

[Xavier_Onassis]

I really do not see this. A Latino who supports Marco Rubio should be able to see right through the guy. He is gutless and the rest of the party gives him no respect.

[Plane]

I don't know this guy well enough to contradict you .


But I really want to.


Got an example of this that you could point to and I could find?

If Latino voters wanted to stage a coup , couldn't they take several key states in the Republican convention?

Would you be against more Latinos having influence in the Republican party?

[Xavier_Onassis]

The Republicans named Mel Martinez GOP Party Chairman. He was the first Latino to serve in the Senate. he was charged with campaign violations and forced to pay $99,000 on fines. he attempted to assist Juniorbush with immigration reform, but failed. Then he resigned from the Senate and went off to become a lobbyist for JP Morgan.
Martinez was apparently not good at raising money for the GOP. It was pretty clear that the party adopted him as a token (must as Steele the Black Gut was a token) and when he could not deliver the $$$ it was adios Martinez.

Rubio was some sort  of high muckymuck in the Clown College known as the Florida State legislature. Lacking a token after hosing martinez, Rubio became the next GOP Token Latino. He was given the job of drawing up an immigration bill, which he did. But then the GOP rejected his plan and sent him off to sit in the corner.

The Republican Party of Florida is among the worst agglomeration of assholes in the known universe.

[Plane]

  What is the complaint?

  That Republican immigration reforms are blocked or that Democratic immigration reforms are blocked?

    Nothing keeps Latinos from being prominent in the Republican party .

[Xavier_Onassis]

Nothing except the constant barrage of Republicans likening the arrival of small, scared children from Central America as an "invasion of cockroaches". Most Latinos have been small scared children and tend to sympathize more with those children than with rightwingers who coinstantly complain about the humiliation of hearing "para español, aprieta el dos".

Nothing other than the realization that the GOP is the party of landlords that raise their rent, bankers that refuse to give them mortgages, and assholes that cannot stop putting down Mexico at every available opportunity.

[sirs]

Nothing except the constant barrage of Republicans likening the arrival of small, scared children from Central America as an "invasion of cockroaches".

Nothing like the constant barrage of Democrats persevering complete misrepresentations of issue after issue after issue, either