A different and interesting take on the IslamoNazi attack in Paris:

[Christians4LessGvt]

A different and interesting take on the IslamoNazi attack in Paris:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5b9_1420741285

[Plane]

    Sometimes it just doesn't pay to be sophisticated.

      If the desired end is for the Muslims of Europe to thrive , then why destroy what measure of safety they already have?

       There may be some thinking of this kind happening somewhere in ISIS or AlQuedia offices, but they are stupid to be so sophisticated . Every reversed effect has a complete potential to double reverse and chaos takes the plan wherever it likes.

     This is like selling your house to buy a  brace of lottery tickets.  It is a dependable way to get rid of a cruddy house , not a dependable way to get a better replacement house.

[Xavier_Onassis]

The idea is to infuriate the non Muslims of Europe enough that they will crack down on the Muslims that live there, many of whom are apathetic about religion. The purpose is to make the young men so annoyed about anti-Muslim taunts and the fact that they cannot get decent jobs that more of them will run off and join ISIS or some other fundie sect in Syria.

[sirs]

What enables radical Muslims to push terrorist attacks, is not cartoons, is not Quantanamo, its previously successful terrorist attacks

[Plane]

The idea is to infuriate the non Muslims of Europe enough that they will crack down on the Muslims that live there, many of whom are apathetic about religion. The purpose is to make the young men so annoyed about anti-Muslim taunts and the fact that they cannot get decent jobs that more of them will run off and join ISIS or some other fundie sect in Syria.

I get that , but who exactly doesn't?

When I feel manipulated I feel most resentful towards the manipulator.

[Xavier_Onassis]

If the Muslim leaders  denounce these acts, they should do so on their own volition and because of their own recognition that it is against the tenets of Islam, not because some twerp like sirs thinks they should do so. On average, the Muslims that live in France are less observant than those who live in the Maghreb. It is a minority of the second generation that has become violent, because they cannot get adequate jobs and are poorly prepared to work in a technologically advanced country. 

[sirs]

If the Muslim leaders  denounce these acts, they should do so on their own volition and because of their own recognition that it is against the tenets of Islam, not because some twerp like sirs thinks they should do so.

Good god, you can be such an idiot some times.  OF COURSE THEY SHOULD DO IT OF THEIR OWN VOLITION.  THEY SHOULD DENOUNCE IT BECAUSE ITS THE RIGHT THING TO DO, NOT BECAUSE SIRS THINKS SO.     

[Xavier_Onassis]

Nice that you should agree.

Since you seemed to think that the NAACP should be disbanded, regardless of what its members thought, this is a positive step.

[sirs]

Once again,  putting your foot in your keyboard mouth.  NEVER ONCE HAVE I SAID THAT THE NAACP SHOULD BE DISBANDED.   Do you ever tire of being so wrong, so often??

[Xavier_Onassis]

You said that there was no reason for the NAACP to exist. What is the difference?

[sirs]

I NEVER SAID THAT EITHER.  But lets pretend I did, just to highlight how deflective you make every attempt at rebutting......one doesn't equate to another.  There's a mountain of intentional difference between the 2.  The former is merely a stated opinion.  The latter is an intention, that requires a subsequent act that should be supported.  You'd think a linguistics professor, of all people, would be able to grasp that.     

[Xavier_Onassis]

This has not one thing to do with linguistics.

The NAACP exists because its membership thinks that it can be useful to them. Your opinion is less than worthless.

[Plane]

   I don't recall any of us saying that the NAACP hasn't a right to exist.

    But is it shrinking because it has a smaller number of members ?

       There is no question that it did good things , I should say heroic things, in the past, but what is it done lately and what is it for now?

[Xavier_Onassis]

I think it is for reinstatement of the Voting Rights Act. It favors government helping to bring more financial equality to all the people ofn this country. The NAACP does not hide its aims and goals, they are readily available online. I do not know whether their membership is smaller than it used to be, but I think that the percentage of Blcak Americans who belong to it is smaller than in the 1960's.

[Plane]

I think it is for reinstatement of the Voting Rights Act.

  Are they that much out of touch?The Voting rights act is still in force.

It favors government helping to bring more financial equality to all the people ofn this country. The NAACP does not hide its aims and goals, they are readily available online. I do not know whether their membership is smaller than it used to be, but I think that the percentage of Blcak Americans who belong to it is smaller than in the 1960's.

I think so also, perhaps there seems to be less urgency and need ?