You are not talking at all about war. You are Christians are blathering on endlessly about what to call the so-called Islamic State, and criticizing Obama for not using the exact words that you want to use.
I am all for defeating and abolishing Dash (ISIS, ISL) by any means that does not involve American troops on the ground in any great numbers, because they are a murderous bunch of fanatics. One thing that will NOT defeat them is calling them "Islamofascists" or some other word dreamed up by the Christian rightwingers, because, again, THESE PEOPLE DO NOT SPEAK ENGLISH English is not the mother tongue of most Muslims, and calling them names in English is like calling you an oghrrshdvfo phrrasttick. Words used by our government, of course, will be translated into Arabic, Pushto, Dari, Bahasa Indonesia Urdu, Berber or some other language. The words RADICAL MUSLIM when translated would probably not be understood as something particularly dreadful, and might be translated as UNALTERED MUSLIM or something like that. Note that Fundamentalist Christians and Primitive Baptists use these terms proudly, even though many other Christians do not.
Barack Obama has a staff of translators who actually know the best way to describe this enemy. You and CU4 have ZERO knowledge of any languages used by Muslims. Using the wrong words in a propaganda war, and that is what is going on now in the press in many languages is like using the wrong tools. You cannot fix a Rolex with a hammer drill. You cannot bake a pie with a blowtorch.
No one can defeat Dash with words. However, using words in English that will be inaccurately translated into Arabic and other languages used by Muslims could result in these people getting even more recruits.
What I am saying is leave this up to the experts. You are not any sort of expert. You are just a twerp who likes to rank about crap that you do not know diddly about.
Of course, nothing anyone says here is of any importance to anyone fighting in Syria or Iraq.