The part of your plan that would not work is bombing another country that has done no serious harm to the American people.
Tells you what little you know of "my plan". 1st off, ANY military intervention, as in ONLY to be applied if specific components of an "understanding to a framework" aren't met, would be SPECIFIC to MILITARY INSTALLATIONS/TARGETS, until said compliance has been met. Not just Iran in general
I do not see Congress voting to bomb Iran over something that does not threaten this country.
While its understandably preferred;
A) As Obama & Clinton have made it crystal clear, thru their actions of drones, tomahawks, and SEALS missions, we can bomb anyone we want, without congressional vote.
B) We do it consistently without a "direct" threat to this country. The threat could be to any of our allies, or government/military assets in the region
Nor do I see this country electing a president that would do this.
No President is going to run on such a platform. What the people elect however are leaders. And leaders, specifically the President in this case, will have to make that decision whether to or not, based on the circumstances they're presented with
Bombing another country is an act of war by definition.
Then Clinton & Obama have been at war since they've taken office. We've been bombing military targets around the region for some time now. Nothing different here, outside of perhaps an increased focus of those strikes.
Israel built a bomb, we did not bomb Israel.
Israel has never proclaimed death to America, not to mention, they're our greatest allie in the region, so why would we??
India built a bomb, we din not bomb India.
India's leadership has never once proclaimed death to America, or death to Israel for that matter.
Pakistan built a bomb, we did not bomb Pakistan.
See above
North Korea built a bomb, we did not bomb North Korea.
See above, although its nice to see you provided a great example of what "diplomacy" looks like, where we negotiated a "treaty", signed and everything, in the clear effort to prevent NK from building nuclear weapons, and we see how well that worked out
None of these four countries has threatened us enough to justify any sort of attack of the sort you describe.
Putting aside how erroneously you descrbed my "attack", none of those 4 are the chief sponsor of terrorist activity, nor have proclaimed death to America as an end goal