Author Topic: The difference between Garland and Paris!  (Read 1835 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11159
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
The difference between Garland and Paris!
« on: May 04, 2015, 11:11:24 AM »


GUNS: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GARLAND AND PARIS

by AWR HAWKINS

3 May 2015

When armed terrorists attacked Charlie Hebdo headquarters over Muhammad cartoons on January 7, unarmed police officers were forced to flee for their lives. When armed men attacked people gathered in Garland, Texas, on May 3 over Prophet Muhammad cartoons, armed police cut them down and the Daily Mail reported that the body of one was left lying the street while police searched for explosives.

The difference between Garland and Paris can be summed up in one word: guns.

On January 7, CBS News relayed reports from Britain's Telegraph newspaper that the first two officers to arrive "were apparently unarmed" and "fled after seeing gunmen armed with automatic weapons and possibly a grenade launcher." The UK's Independent reported that "three policemen arrived on bikes but had to leave because [the attackers] were armed."

BBC reported the Paris gunmen killed 12 in their attack on Charlie Hebdo headquarters; that number includes 8 Charlie Hebdo "eight journalists, two police officers, a caretaker and a visitor."

Moreover, the terrorists were able to continue their attack at different points in and around the city for the next 48 hours.

On January 19, Breitbart News reported that French police were demanding more guns as well as guns that were more powerful.  The Charlie Hebdo attack was very lopsided "in favor of the terrorists" because of policing and arms policies, and had revealed a very important point: Gun control was not working.

Fast forward to Garland, Texas on Sunday, where approximately 75 attendees gathered in the Curtis Culwell Center to attend a contest for the best cartoon of Muhammad. The contest was sponsored by New York-based American Freedom Defense Initiative.

Just before the contest ended, two armed men allegedly drove up near the Culwell Center and shot and wounded a security guard before both were killed by heavily-armed Garland PD.

According to a City of Garland May 3 press release:

As today's Muhammad Art Exhibit event at the Curtis Culwell Center was coming to an end, two males drove up to the front of the building in a car. Both males were armed and began shooting at a Garland ISD security officer. The GISD security officer?s injuries are not life-threatening. Garland Police officers engaged the gunmen, who were both shot and killed.

There was no prolonged, two-day pursuit of attackers, nor were there unarmed police officers dodging bullets on their bicycles. But there were plenty of guns in the hands of good guys who were keeping watch over the cartoon contest and who were charged with stopping any bad guys with guns who might show up.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/03/guns-the-difference-between-garland-and-paris/
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2015, 02:11:50 AM »
Remember the videos taken in Paris, where the islamic thugs basically roamed the streets at will.....even approached a police officer, and shot him point blank in the head.  No such scenario here in the U.S., and Texas in particular, when before these Islamic thugs could get stated, a police officer recognized what was about to go down, and took them both down....just like that.

I suppose some would argue that the officers used excessive force.  Perhaps they needed to back off and call for reinforcements.  Right?
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2015, 10:33:55 AM »
The MAJOR difference, was that Charlie Hebdo did the same thing, day after day, for years.
The Texas bunch was deliberately provocative and they EXPECTED what happened.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2015, 12:17:49 PM »
Yea....that has to be it    ::)
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11159
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2015, 05:17:48 PM »
Yea....that has to be it    ::)

yes SIRS that poor UN-ARMED French Police officer who was executed
while laying on the ground begging for his life would not have liked to have had
the 45 pistol the Garland police officer used to kill the two Islamo-Nazis in Garland!

"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11159
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2015, 07:02:51 PM »
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2015, 08:24:34 PM »
Gets my vote
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8037
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2015, 08:48:03 PM »
Wow here's where my art background comes into play here. It's been brought that the contest would be considered a hate crime since it's directed at a specific group. But my memory remembers maplethorpe exhibits that's directly an attack on catholism. Both are just as protected

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2015, 09:46:11 PM »
  That is true Kimba, but in the same sort of way that I didn't like "Piss Christ" or a Madonna made of dung, I shall refrain from making light of and disrespecting the icons of another religion.

   The hypocrisy would be sharp, if I made an artwork intended to anger someone, when I was displeased at suchathing aimed at me.

     But to protect speech that is objectionable is a good American tradition, if we only protect speech that is harmless and agreeable what would be the point of the protection?

      A Muslim who realizes that our tolerance of the different, is the reason that he is allowed to build a Mosque, can be a good American citizen and learn to fight speech with speech, and repay tolerance with tolerance.

      There must be such persons, what keeps us from hearing them?

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11159
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2015, 10:30:03 PM »
in the same sort of way that I didn't like "Piss Christ" or a Madonna made of dung, I shall refrain from making light of and disrespecting the icons of another religion.

yeah that pissed me off soooooo bad I considered strapping on body-armor,
loading the car with bombs, machine guns, and ammo, driving a couple
thousand miles....and trying to murder a bunch of people!

NOT!!!!!!!

LOL
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2015, 11:06:28 PM »
in the same sort of way that I didn't like "Piss Christ" or a Madonna made of dung, I shall refrain from making light of and disrespecting the icons of another religion.

yeah that pissed me off soooooo bad I considered strapping on body-armor,
loading the car with bombs, machine guns, and ammo, driving a couple
thousand miles....and trying to murder a bunch of people!

NOT!!!!!!!

LOL


Yes, that is the point.

Millions of Christians ticked off, not a lot of violence.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2015, 11:09:47 PM »
Muslims seem to be more likely to be violent about defending their religion than Christians.

That does not mean that all or even most, Muslims are violent.

It is absurd to ridicule the symbols of any religion.  No good can come from this,
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2015, 11:38:12 PM »
   The violent faction of Islam think themselves to finest of Muslims.

     They are definitely a small minority of the Ummah .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ummah 

But they hope to inspire replacements faster than attrition , if they can, what else would they need?



Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11159
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2015, 03:56:21 PM »
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: The difference between Garland and Paris!
« Reply #14 on: May 08, 2015, 02:30:44 AM »
Muslims seem to be more likely to be violent about defending their religion than Christians.

That does not mean that all or even most, Muslims are violent.


And who would be claiming, or even implying that?


It is absurd to ridicule the symbols of any religion.  No good can come from this,

Sure didn't cause any Christians to start killing or beheading anyone when the virgin Mary was covered with feces, and called "art"
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle