EXPOSED: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS!

[Christians4LessGvt]

EXPOSED:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS HID $50K CLINTON FOUNDATION
DONATION FROM VIEWERS



By JOHN NOLTE

14 May 20151445

While reporting on, and aggressively defending the Clinton Foundation from numerous scandals and ethical issues, George Stephanopoulos, the star and poster boy of ABC News, hid his own conflict of interest from viewers. According to Politico, Bill Clinton's former war room soldier and press secretary, the current anchor of "Good Morning America" and "This Week," has donated at least $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation.

This is a bombshell of a black eye for ABC News.

Since ABC News hired Stephanopoulos as its chief anchor and chief political correspondent, many questioned how a former-Democrat operative could remain neutral in the role of a news anchor. Even before Hillary Clinton entered the 2016 presidential race, on numerous occasions Stephanopoulos exposed himself as a Democrat operative working as a news man.

With a bizarre but brilliant birth control question during a 2012 GOP presidential debate, it was Stephanopoulos alone who launched the dishonest "War on Women" narrative against the GOP in 2012, one of Obama's (and the media's) most effective re-election weapons.

Bias is one thing.

A conflict of interest is one thing.

Reporting on and defending the Clinton Foundation in front of the whole world without disclosing your $50,000 donation to that very same foundation is a cover up, a four alarm scandal.

ABC News has a Brian Williams-problem. Actually, it is worse. Stephanopoulos and ABC News covered up a $50,000 conflict-of-interest involving nothing less than presidential politics. By comparison, Brian Williams  and his fairy tales are the stuff of Eagle Scouts.

To no one's surprise, ABC News is currently standing by their exposed and disgraced anchor man.

John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/05/14/exposed-george-stephanopoulos-hid-50k-clinton-foundation-donation-from-viewers/

[Xavier_Onassis]

This does not change the fact that the GOP DOES have a War on women.
It does not want women to be able to decide whether to have an abortion.
It does not think that a woman 's right to receive birth control pills from her employer's health insurance plan is more important that the "religious views" of the employer.

It has never run a woman for national office, not ever.

As for Breitbart, it is the very definition of a "conflict of interest". It is not in any way anything but 100% biased towards the right and should go fuck itself.

I shall continue to watch Stephenopoulous.

[Plane]

It has never run a woman for national office, not ever.

http://history.house.gov/Exhibition-and-Publications/WIC/Women-in-Congress/


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

Of the first ten Women in the House of Representatives, eight were Republican, in the first seven seven were Republican.

  Democrats came late to Women's issues  , but in typical Democrat fashion , they own it now, as if you hve to be a Democrat to be a woman.

[Plane]

As for Breitbart, it is the very definition of a "conflict of interest". It is not in any way anything but 100% biased towards the right and should go fuck itself.

  This is true , but they have never pretended otherwise.

    This same thing is true of Mr. Stephanopoulos, but he is pantomiming a journalist . 

[sirs]

It has never run a woman for national office, not ever.

http://history.house.gov/Exhibition-and-Publications/WIC/Women-in-Congress/


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_United_States_House_of_Representatives

Of the first ten Women in the House of Representatives, eight were Republican, in the first seven seven were Republican.

  Democrats came late to Women's issues  , but in typical Democrat fashion , they own it now, as if you hve to be a Democrat to be a woman.

D'oh....say it ain't so....the professor is *gasp*...wrong again?  Hehe.....all in good fun, xo

[Christians4LessGvt]

This does not change the fact that the GOP DOES have a War on women.

This does not change the fact that the Democratic Party DOES have a war on women.

The Democratic Party wants to allow female unborn babies to be killed.

The Democratic Party wants higher taxes on corporations who simply
pass that cost on and it hits struggling single Mothers the most.

Under Democrat Obama more women are out of work.

it was even revealed that Obama's White House pays its female employees $11,000 less per year,
on average, than their male colleagues....yeah war on women!

[Xavier_Onassis]

Women have the RIGHT to decide things for themselves.

Sarah Palin is a profiteering jerk, she collects campaign money and runs no campaigns, she keeps it for herself. No one with a brain takes her sorry ass seriously.

The REpublican Party is a disaster and an enemy of most of the people of this country.

Especially women.  GOPers say that women should be denied control of their own bodies. That is as anti-woman as it gets.

[sirs]

Women have the RIGHT to decide things for themselves.

ABSOLUTELY......until it affects the RIGHT of someone else.....especially the RIGHT to LIVE.  In other words, they can do anything they want with their bodies.....COMPLETE CONTROL.  You don't have the control to take my life.  Nor should a woman have the control of taking someone else's life merely because they have ovaries

And regardless of your opinion of Mrs Palin, the claim that the GOP has never had a female run a national campaign is what got bitch slapped there

The REpublican Party is a disaster and an enemy of most of the people of this country.

Putting aside the absolute disaster being waged on this country, with the Democrat polcies ram rodded down our throats, when they were in the majority the 1st 2 years of Obama, again a great example of the mindset of the rabid left.....its that kind of perverted thinking that then allows the justification of any and everything done, in the name of defeating those evil GOP'ers.  Lying?... Absolutely ok.  Unethical conduct?... of course.  Criminal conduct?... definitely warranted, since its "an enemy of the people".  Whatever it takes.....dead people voting, multiple voting, denying groups that might vote for those evil GOP'rs, any and everything

[Xavier_Onassis]

Fetuses are not people and do not have rights. 

You are an asshole.

[Plane]

Fetuses are not people ........................

This is just an error.

[sirs]

However,  it's that disconnect error that allows the mindset to kill an unborn child

[Xavier_Onassis]

Stephanopolous did not bribe anyone. He did nothing illegal.

And every pregnant woman should be able to decide for herself what her fetus is. It is not up to you, because you have nothing to do with it.

[sirs]

Stephanopolous did not bribe anyone. He did nothing illegal.

Dr Deflection strikes again........NO ONE SAID HE DID     

And every pregnant woman should be able to decide for herself what her fetus is.

Umm...no.  That's a separate body than her own, with its own life, separate from hers.  She has complete control of her body.  An unborn child is an unborn child is an unborn child.  No manner of trying to dehumanize the child by using a technical term will deny that it is an unborn child

[Xavier_Onassis]

Since you are also engaged in a war on women, your opinion does not count.

[sirs]

Putting aside the idiocy of trying to claim your opinion holds more water than mine, more accurately, I'm engaged in a war on murdering innocent unborn children.  A woman can do whatever the hell she wants.....so long as it doesn't take the life of an unborn child