It would have been better off for both Zimmerman and Martin had Zimmerman just kept on a-driving. No laws were being broken, he had no reason to bother Martin.
Neither did Mr Martin have any justification for beating Mr. Zimmerman this is not even. bothering someone with unwelcome presence is an order of magnitude less malicious than is an attempt to crack a persons skull.
Zimmerman was the older, and therefore he should have been the most responsible.
Even so. he was never outside his rights to walk , not outside his rights to speak. Why would Mr. Martin be within his rights to throw Mr. Zimmerman down and beat him even a little?
Both of these guys behaved like morons, of course.
The fault is not evenly distributed , both had cell phones , both felt suspicious, one of them called 911, the other seems to have set up an ambush.
It is never a good idea to kill anyone. There was no war going on there.
Which one are you referring to?
It is a good idea to avoid violence as long as there is a better choice .
By the time Mr. Zimmerman's gun became involved Mr. Zimmerman was on his back and being beaten, was he at this point unreasonable to be worried about his being killed?