Racebaiter FairyCon is out further dividing our country for his agenda

[Christians4LessGvt]

Louis Farrakhan : "They Don't Give a Damn About Them 9"

June 24, 2015

By Hufsa Kamal

Louis Farrakhan addressed hundreds Wednesday at the Metropolitan AME Church in D.C. Religious leaders from various background joined Farrakhan to talk about the Millions for Justice Mobilization taking place in D.C. in October.

His speech took an angry turn when he said white people don't care about the people who died in the South Carolina church shootings.

"White folks march with you because they don't want you upsetting the city," he said in reference to protesting against the South Carolina shootings.

His comments were met by cheers and applause.

He added his disdain for the North Carolina police who fed Dylann Roof, the Charleston church shooting suspect, Burger King after he was arrested.

Farrakhan also attacked the American flag, saying "What the hell is the use of us paying allegiance to a flag under which we get no justice?"

http://www.wmal.com/2015/06/24/listen/

[kimba1]

Farrakhan?

I didn`t know people still listen to him. don`t we have real muslims to deal with?

[Xavier_Onassis]

Yeah, Farrakhan is guilty of the whole thing.
If it were not for Farrakhan, there would have been no massacre.

Let's blame Farrakhan! 

[sirs]

And of course, you can point out as to who is actually claiming that If it were not for Farrakhan, there would have been no massacre,  Right, Dr Deflection?  Good luck with that

[Xavier_Onassis]

The fact is that Farrakhan had absolutely nothing to do with the victims or the  gun crazed maniac.

No White folks have called Roof a "thug". Have you noticed?

You wise off to a cop, you are a thug.

You shoot nine innocent people in church, you aren't.

Oh, dear, what could the difference be?

[sirs]

And who the hell says that if you shoot nine innocent people you're not a thug??  Hell, you're far worse.  He's a racist murderer.  MOST EVERYONE IS CALLING HIM THAT.  You'd prefer he merely be called a thug??     

[Xavier_Onassis]

I just noticed that no one used the word "thug"
Though it could be applied to him.

He does not look very thuggish. He is rather puny and has a really silly Moe the Stooge haircut.

Louis Farrakhan is a rather demented propagandist, but he is not a "Fairy" despite his name. He is many things, but homosexual is not one of them. He was born Louis Eugene Wolcott, his parents were from St Kitts and Jamaica. He was born in 1933, so he does not surface all that often.

The Nation of Islam suffered a setback when space aliens failed to arrive to pick up Elijah Mohammad as promised. They were also supposed to  exterminate White folks.
Malcolm X and Elijah Mohammad's son both established more standard Muslim organizations, but I think Farrakhan ended up with most of the membership.

[Plane]

Dylann Roof = Thug

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/charleston-church-shooting/charleston-church-shooting-federal-charges-likely-dylann-roof-n381326


This seems to shortchange Thugs.

Few thugs are so craven and depraved and lightweight.

[sirs]

I just noticed that no one used the word "thug"

Probably because he's FAR WORSE than simply some thug.  But if you want to minimize him to a mere thug, be my guest     

[kimba1]

Hey!!

I refer to myself as thug and as an asian i have a bigger claim than most.

I never thought of that word in racial context at all.

[sirs]

Me neither.  Go figure.  I guess some folks just HAVE to see race in everything     

[kimba1]

I saw the vid which the person is trying get people to say nigger instead of thug. I'm still gonna use the word thug because thats not what i use that word for

[Xavier_Onassis]

It is rather dim to dredge up an ancient figure like Farrakhan to accuse him of divisiveness. Farrakhan has a tiny following, and people who agree with him now are the same as people who have always agreed with him.

This is just a feeble and lame attempt to somehow accuse a B;lack guy of having something to do with what was clearly and completely an attack by a gun nut White racist.
If Farrakhan had never existed, it would have changed absolutely NOTHING.

Another moronic "blame the victim attack". Typical of right wing racists.

Add to that the stupid bit where his name is altered to "Fairy con". Farrakhan may be a loudmouth, but he  is neither a fairy nor a con.

[sirs]

Putting aside that the article isn't solely blaming Farrakhan of divisiveness, merely contributing to it, how the hell is he a "victim" to blame in this??

[Xavier_Onassis]

Blame the Black guy for what the White guy did.

Definition of "victim" a person blamed unjustly.

Farrakhan had nothing to do with this, has never advocated anyone to use violence other than in self defense if attacked first, and nothing he says will provoke any more attacks.

He is not a fairy. He is not a con.