Sleeze factor

[sirs]

You really want to pull out the spelling card??  The point was made....& trying to argue spelling is.....shall we say yet another deflection from the point that was made. 

But you do, what you genetically feel compelled to do.  I guess you wouldn't be you if you weren't pulling that tactic     

[Xavier_Onassis]

Since I can't teach you how to reason, I have dumbed down my curriculum and have limited myself to teaching you simpler chores.

We all have to make sacrifices (sigh).

[sirs]

Given the exampes of your "teaching", I'd be surprised if you were able to teach an illegal immigrant any Spanish

Seriously though, this is more projection, in that you have demonstrated absolutely zilch ability to reason.  Those blinders are so thick, your ideology so set, its no wonder that you make things up to argue, like corruption when there was no reference to it, although you kept insisting that's what I had to mean

Give us one example where you demonstrated an ability to reason

[sirs]

Give us one example where you demonstrated an ability to reason

Didn't think so

[Xavier_Onassis]

You don't think at all.

You do stupid Republican tricks, like invent scales of scumminess that make no sense.

[sirs]

Dr Deflection strikes again, throwing his standard barrage of insults while avoiding the substantive inquiry like the plague.  Bravo

[Xavier_Onassis]

You do not appear to be actually capable of "substantive inquiry".

I doubt the "substantial inquiry" is actually possible when discussing your self-invented scale of scumminess.

Just as one cannot engage in "substantive inquiry" regarding Goofy's underwear or the possibility of an atomic-powered spaghetti fork.

[sirs]

Your 99% erroneous opinion not withstanding, the substantive inquiry was made to demonstrate even one example of you being reasonable.  Ball in your court

[Xavier_Onassis]

Asking for a "substantial" anything on this topic, ie your silly scumminess scale is impossible, like putting a tuxedo on and unwilling Orangutan.

[sirs]

The inquiry had nothing to do with scum, but ANY example of you demonstrating an ability to reason, in ANY thread.  And as you keep demonstrating,  none appear to be coming forward

Like I said. ..... didn't think so

[Xavier_Onassis]

I reasoned that Iraq had no WMD's and was not a threat to the US, and that invading Iraq was a monumental mistake.
I reasoned that Iraq has=d no nuclear weapons or weaponized anthrax or smallpox.
I reasoned that invading Afghanistan would result in an expensive and long need to keep troops there.
I reasoned that President Obama would beat first McCain and then Romney.

[sirs]

Someone needs to pull out a dictionary to come up with what reasoning is related to.  Here's a hint...it has nothing to do with reasoning about your own opinion or prediction

Please try again.  In what thread, and with what poster have you demonstrated an ability to reason with?  You don't even have to be so specific as to a specific thread, just to the best of your recollection, who did you reason with, in the same vane that I supposedly can't be reasoned with.  I can spout off a bunch of predictions that came to fruition, and call it reasoning they way you're trying....such as Obama being the most devisive President in our history, and that his trademark piece of crap legislation was all built and pushed on a lie.  But this has nothing to do with me or my past.  This is all about you.

[Plane]

I reasoned that Iraq had no WMD's and was not a threat to the US, and that invading Iraq was a monumental mistake.
I reasoned that Iraq has=d no nuclear weapons or weaponized anthrax or smallpox.

Did you require evidence?

[Xavier_Onassis]

Of course, I had evidence. I knew that Dick Cheney would lie, lie, lie for any cause that benefited him. Juniorbush was a rather dense puppet of Cheney and his family, and he did what he was told. His personal history was a series of instances in which his only successes were done by doing as he was told.

By the way, it is SLEAZE, not SLEEZE. There is a spell checker connected to this site.  It is logical to use it and illogical to fail to use it.

[sirs]

When you're on a computer that does NOT have it, it can NOT be used.  Logic having nothing to do with it