Point is, Polls that you were touting before, when Clinton was supposedly beating everyone now are to be condemned because the pollsters lie and are bribed? So........when Clinton was ahead of everyone back then, she really wasn't, as the pollsters were bribed back then as well, right?
Or, is the theme here that anything good reported about Democrats is perfectly on the up & up, but anything that points negatively about the Democrats is wayward lies & bribes? Is that it?