......... ran way too many cattle on government and and ruined it. Then he refused to pay for it.
Overgrazed?
I hadn't heard this before.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundy_standoffFrom reading this , it looks like a claim of overgrazing is weak, but Bundy's claim that he owes no rent is weak.
He isn't an especially sympathetic character, but it shouldn't be surprising that he gets a lot of sympathy, government behavior has been irritating even more people than Bundy's behavior could.
The more basic question should be ,Is it proper for the Federal Government to own most of the land in a state?
Is it proper to charge more in rent for grazing, than the cattle on the range are worth?
Too bad Bundy is so garrulous, if he were better spoken, he would be more liable to win this.
I have never been to Nevada , but I have been to Vieques, Puerto Rico. I was there employed by the US Navy helping to shoot it up.
I do hate to say , this reminds me of that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vieques,_Puerto_RicoLooks like the people won against the government on that one.
Should we hope that the government quash the people in Nevada?