Ted Cruz Nails It On Illegal Immigration

[Christians4LessGvt]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-SC1uUiT9s

[sirs]

He nails most everything.  Just wish he had some executive experience

[Xavier_Onassis]

Cruz is nothing but a lying shyster with the voice of a cartoon duck.

[sirs]

Your perseverating opinion on the man is duly noted         And you would be the expert on knowing, as well as supporting lying shysters

[Xavier_Onassis]

Trump wants to make the Mexicans pay for the wall. Cruz has no idea how to pay for it.

No doubt by reducing taxes. Yeah, that is the ticket.  This country already has far more lawyers than it can support, thanks to tax breaks and student loans to people who attend fly-by-night law schools.

All Cruz is good at is being annoying. He should check and see if there is some toon that needs a voice for a villain.

[sirs]

And again, your opinion is duly noted.  I'm confident every GOP candidate would be declared some form of an annoying lying shyster.  Then again, as already noted, you excel on supporting such shysters, so you apparently can spot them easily

[Xavier_Onassis]

Ted has made a career of being a shyster lawyer, and not the kind that battles corporations, but the kind that corporations hire to battle the average citizen.

He is not going to get the nomination. If he does, he will lose.

[sirs]

And you definately would know shyster liars, being so supportive of them

[Christians4LessGvt]

Ted has made a career of being a shyster lawyer, and not the kind that battles corporations, but the kind that corporations hire to battle the average citizen.

Long before Hillary Clinton was giving $200,000 speeches, and taking huge donations from Wall Street, in six years as a member of the Wal-Mart board of directors, between 1986 and 1992, Hillary Clinton remained silent as the world's largest retailer waged a major campaign against labor unions seeking to represent store workers.

[Plane]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-SC1uUiT9s

Oh , that is funny.

But aren't the wealthy and well paid of the world actually traveling the world with little impediment?

[Xavier_Onassis]

You do not know that  Hillary said nothing about WalMart's union busting, only that she did not change the company.

By the way, you should know that corporations often appoint popular celebrities to their boards to show the public how in touch they are with the hoi polloi, but the board is divided into at least two groups: the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors meets in executive sessions in which the other directors are excluded. That is where things like employment policies are discussed. The celebrities on the board decide who gets to light the Corporate Christmas Tree, and who gets to receive charitable donations.  They get to be photographed handing out awards and plaques and brobdinagian checks. The members of the Executive Committee of the Board do not like to be photographed. It means that they need to pay more for bodyguards, among o0ther things.

Corporations, in reality, are run far more like Stalin's Kremlin than like the House of Commons. I see Hillary as better than any of the total sellouts that the Republicans have vying for their nomination, but I like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders a LOT more than Hillary, especially when I consider what they might accomplish. Campaign promises are never implemented fully, because of the way our rather archaic and ossified system works.

[sirs]

But let's ignore of course, the millions upon millions of $$$$'s said stalinist corporations have donated to Clinton.  Yea, nothing nefarious there     

[Xavier_Onassis]

Stalinist Corporations?
I have been a shareholder of many corporations. Apparently you have not.
The ballot they send out gives the shareholder a very limited choice.

For Chairman: G. Barton Peabody III.
For President of the corporation: M. Peabody Barton.
For members of the board: J Sutton Gottrocks,  H. Frumpton Squeasley, J. Bloor Elderhyde,  Aloysis Freen IV, Demetry Kysylyznsky.

You have two choices:  You can vote to retain the members or you can vote not to retain them. It never mentions what might happen if a majority of the shareholder reject the board and officers. Most of the stock is owned by investment companies, affiliated companies and by trusts, who always vote all their shares to retain the board.

Not one in 100 corporate elections results in the board not being retained.
Just like the ballot in the days of Stalin.

I have mentioned this before, but your memory does not seem to function properly so there it is again.

[sirs]

Stalinist Corporations?

Just using your association of Stalin to corporations, is all.  Point being those corporations have given millions to Clinton, that you'd be evicerating any Republican for.  Can we say "double standard"?  I knew you could.

[Plane]

brobdinagian

Ha! I like Swift.

Corporations, in reality, are run far more like Stalin's Kremlin than like the House of Commons. I see Hillary as better than any of the total sellouts that the Republicans have vying for their nomination, but I like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders a LOT more than Hillary, especially when I consider what they might accomplish. Campaign promises are never implemented fully, because of the way our rather archaic and ossified system works.
[/quote]

    Would a more democratically organized company be competitive?