National Review disses Trump

[Xavier_Onassis]

It may not technically be racism, but it is clearly stereotypical bigotry, which is equally odious.

Mexico will not build any wall, and the US may only extend the wall they already have around populated areas, but there will not be a uniform wall along the entire border.  This is not a major issue, in any case. Trump has no real economic plan, and he lacks the ability to deal with Congress. He would be a disaster as president.

But he will never be president.

We will all get to see him throw a major tantrum, eventually.

It will be more amusing than Fonzie jumping the shark.

[Religious Dick]

Trump has simply grown a constituency out of racists, and dummies who think that anyone has managed to get very rich must also be very smart.

Racists and dummies are entitled to their opinion just like anyone else, and apparently there are plenty of them. They also get to vote just like anyone else. Deal.

I notice Nationalist parties in Europe like the Front Nationale, Vlaams Belaang, Jobbik and UKIP are doing pretty good these days, too. Apparently peasants all over the West have a few things to tell The Enlightened? these days.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Trump is not a bigot in the traditional sense. he pretty much looks down on everyone who disagrees with him as inferior.
He does use bigotry against Mexicans, veterans who get captured,  women who do not look attractive to him,  people with deformities, and anyone else who fails to recognize his utter greatness to gather in a mob of bullies who support him.

[Christians4LessGvt]

he pretty much looks down on everyone who disagrees with him as inferior.

that describes liberalism to a "T"

liberalism = "you don't agree with this?"
"ok then we know whats best for you & we'll pass a law to force your ass to do what we want"

[sirs]

he pretty much looks down on everyone who disagrees with him as inferior.

that describes liberalism to a "T"

liberalism = "you don't agree with this?"
"ok then we know whats best for you & we'll pass a law to force your ass to do what we want"

BINGO!!

[Xavier_Onassis]

"ok then we know whats best for you & we'll pass a law to force your ass to do what we want"

===========================================
Yeah, that's the ticket.

That is how Obama came and took away all your guns.

[sirs]

yea....too bad the Constitution, got in his way

[Plane]

"ok then we know whats best for you & we'll pass a law to force your ass to do what we want"

===========================================
Yeah, that's the ticket.

That is how Obama came and took away all your guns.

Exactly what I don't like about him.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Yeah, you all hate Obama because he took away your guns.

You donlt even realize how utterly STUPID that sounds.

[sirs]

Apparently you were too STUPID to notice the point that the Constitution got in his way of any such effort.  Here's a reminder.....CONGRESS makes the laws, not Obama or any President for that matter.  That's kind of how our Government works, for those who lack basic Constitutional knowledge

[Xavier_Onassis]

Obama has not even tried to take your stupid guns.

[sirs]

Any new executive actions in bypassing congress & the Constitution is yet another progressive attempt to "take our guns"

[Xavier_Onassis]

You are a fool. There is no ban on your gun ownership. Everything proposed is on forbidding the sale of guns and accessories, like ammo clips not yet sold.

[Plane]

You are a fool. There is no ban on your gun ownership. Everything proposed is on forbidding the sale of guns and accessories, like ammo clips not yet sold.

Is this a distinction or a difference?

If we could buy any gun that we wanted , but couldn't buy the ammunition or accessories that we needed , then this would be a distinction that made no difference.

[Xavier_Onassis]

If you had the amount of ammo that is reported, then it would not inconvenience you at all.

No one needs hundreds of bullets to defend themselves.

No one.

Nor do they need 20 or 50 or 100 bullet clips.

The Whiskey Rebellion and Shea's Rebellion proved that citizens with guns cannot successfully defy a government with an army.