National Review disses Trump

[sirs]

Once again, xo proving Cu4's demonstration of others who are to dictate what others need and don't need.  News flash professor, a responsible gun owner needs hundreds and hundreds of rounds to maintain a level of sharpness & proficiency, by practicing at gun ranges or in the woods, away from people.  You have no clue how many rounds I've gone thru in my lifetime as a gun owner......that'd be in the thousands.  Your supportive rhetoric of what Obama and the left is trying to pull is precisely the point being made on your side's efforts to ultimately ban weapons.

Again, good thing the Constitution keeps getting in your side's way

[Plane]

No one needs hundreds of bullets to defend themselves.

No one.

This is not true , and to those who know guns well the statement sounds silly.

How do you get to Carnegie Hall?

[Xavier_Onassis]

You do not need to have a clip that holds 20-50 bullets to practice shooting a gun.

[sirs]

There is no limit to "need" when defending oneself.  The issue of high capacity magazines is practicality.  No responsible gun owner is going to want to carry 100 round magazines.  However, there's nothing wrong with 20 to 30 round magazines

[Plane]

You do not need to have a clip that holds 20-50 bullets to practice shooting a gun.

True , and I have never owned a gun with a really large clip.

But buying hundreds of rounds and burning them in practice I have certainly done.

Saying this is un-necessary is a good cause of eye rolling for those in the know.


Now , while great big clips were made illegal to make or sell during the Clinton administration and stayed illegal for ten years a documentable zero(0) lives were spared.

So how is the argument that we do not need them stronger than the argument that we do not need to forbid them.

[Xavier_Onassis]

You cannot say that no lives were saved.
You certainly cannot say that limiting huge ammo clips will never save lives. They certainly will not make anyone safer.

[sirs]

You cannot say that no lives were saved.

Sure I can......adnauseum.

You certainly cannot say that limiting huge ammo clips will never save lives. They certainly will not make anyone safer.

I certainly can say that too, and they do

[Xavier_Onassis]

You continue to be full of shit.

[sirs]

And your opinion on that matter continues to be meritless

[Plane]

You cannot say that no lives were saved.
You certainly cannot say that limiting huge ammo clips will never save lives. They certainly will not make anyone safer.

http://www.macon.com/news/local/crime/article30138393.html

In this attack a couple were attacked in their own backyard, shot in their car.

The unarmed man was dead, the woman had a pistol with an empty clip.

One of the attackers was dropped off, dying, in his mothers front yard.

Apparently this woman lived until her ammunition ran out.

Would she have lived through the incident and saved the mans life if she had more shots?

No one knows.

But remember, next time you are ambushed , it is now too late to go get more, what you have with you is the whole budget.

If you have few, be cagey with them.