A little perspective

[Plane]

Why is an egg not a chicken?

Good question, I suggest that there is no good answer to it.

Though I have heard that a Chicken is mostly an egg's way of making more eggs.

But as an answer to my question I find it seriously wanting , neither a chicken nor an egg deserves the respect and protection of law that any human being does.


Do you mean that a chicken is not an egg in the same sense that a woman is not a man? That a child is not an adult, a girl is not a woman, or a boy is not a Man?

That is, not in any way that should matter before the law?

[Xavier_Onassis]

The production of eggs should be left to the hen. The fate of every fetus should b determined by the pr4egnanyt woman and not you and your band of religious misogynistic nut cases. This is no a matter for governments.

If you think that unborn fetuses have rights, you shou8ld concentrate this weird view on the women whose right it is to make the decision. This should not be a matter for government and politics. You are trying to impose your wacko religious views on everyone else.

[Christians4LessGvt]

[Xavier_Onassis]

You want the government to force women to give birth.

Excuse me while I am 100% unimpressed.

Every time you wank off you are dooming 100,000 sperm from fulfilling what God promised them.

[sirs]

Sperm require an egg to fulfil what God promised them.  Biology 101     

[Xavier_Onassis]

They are alive and the wiggle and we know they are human.

[sirs]

They are alive, but not human, nor know they are.  They have only 1 function.....find an egg to fertilize.  Then, and ONLY then, has it become a human life.  Biology, 101

[Xavier_Onassis]

So go on and wank off all you want.

I think the Bible opposes it. If the Bible is the word of God, then God must be against it.

[sirs]

What you think and what actually is, generally are 2 different planets

[Plane]

So go on and wank off all you want.

I think the Bible opposes it. If the Bible is the word of God, then God must be against it.

Do you mean the death of Onan?

He was obliged to cause a pregnancy, his sin was disobeying that command.

Not the coitus interuptus by itself, but the avoidance of his responsibility.

So no , I don't know that the scriptures are against the wank.

[Plane]

You are trying to impose your wacko religious views on everyone else.

Is it a whacko religious view of yours that persons can be separated from their personhood by the application of a Latin word?


Short search of Google Translate.

Ah HA!

You sir are a Senex!

This, of course, changes your standing before the law, just the same as calling a baby a fetus reduces it from a him or her to an it.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Let the woman decide what to call it and its fate.

It ainlt any of your beeswax.

[Plane]

 It is hard to understand your attitude.

Would you favor allowing men the right to kill their wives?

Long as it is no one you know?

[Xavier_Onassis]

If their wives are entirely housed within the husbands' bodies, yes, of course.

[Plane]

  That would be no problem.

    For a cannibal.

  Is that what the personhood of a person depends on?