President Trump

[Xavier_Onassis]

St Ronald of Reagan went to Japan and came back a million dollars richer.

Hillary understands US politics, and Trump does not understand diddly.

[Plane]

It is impossible to conceive of  anyone less qualified who could get the nomination.

I can think of someone less charming and more bumbling and less honest and more grasping.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_reset


Oh- and more embarrassing.

[Plane]

St Ronald of Reagan went to Japan and came back a million dollars richer.

Hillary understands US politics, and Trump does not understand diddly.

The text of that Reagan speech is secret?

[Xavier_Onassis]

Why don't you find out?

At this point, what difference does it make? The old buggers's dead.
The point is that he took money - LOT of money for making a speech.
Either both of them can be considered corrupt or neither can. I say the latter.

[sirs]

News flash, Dr Deflection.....no one is claiming that Clinton shouldn't get paid for making a damn speech.       This is entirely about what's in those speeches that she doens't want anyone to see.  Probably because it showers corporate America with praise and an "atta-boy" at such a good job they're doing, while she sings a different campaign tune to the ignorant voters she's trying to sway

THAT's the difference that it makes

[Xavier_Onassis]

So you  think that she has promised to obey the dictates of the bankers?

I would imagine that the speeches she gave would have  Q and A sessions related to them at the same time, and others who asked her questions and commented on what she may have said have not given permission to have what they said exposed.

Her words, whatever they were, would be twisted, turned and misquoted.
I know what Trump stands for and I do not see  where Hillary would be even a tenth as awful a president as The Donald.

[sirs]

So you  think that she has promised to obey the dictates of the bankers?

I have no idea......I think I already indicated what she likely said.....which would be run as commercials, into the ground by Sanders.  Thus her choice not to release what she said.  Would demonstrate her blatent duplicity, in talking out of besides of her mouth. 

[Plane]

So you  think that she has promised to obey the dictates of the bankers?

Bingo.

[Plane]

St Ronald of Reagan went to Japan and came back a million dollars richer.

Is the text of that speech secret?

Why don't you find out?

At this point, what difference does it make? The old buggers's dead.
The point is that he took money - LOT of money for making a speech.
Either both of them can be considered corrupt or neither can. I say the latter.

I remember the occasion , no, not secret, Reagan never gave a speech that needed to be made secret as far as I can tell.

Should Reagan have gotten four times what Hillary did for a speech , then let that speech be published?

Hardly seems fair.

Shouldn't the oligarchs that paid such a fee have the right to keep the speech a secret?