Author Topic: A Black Female Trump Executive Speaks: "The Trump Family That I Know"  (Read 3861 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
A Black Female Trump Executive Speaks: "The Trump Family That I Know"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxaKUo5naoY
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Some consultant asked Trump if he had some Black woman who could  say nice things about the Donald, and suprise! there was such a person and they trotted her out to  glorify the boss.

If this impresses you, you are a fool.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
  It is often convenient to reject all evidence that is contradictory to preconceived notions.

   It is a little unscientific , but very convenient.

     People do it all the time ,
      This explains the enormous inertia  of well established ideas aka ,thinking in a rut.


      Trump is accused of racism, often as if this should be accepted without evidence.

       Evidence to the contrary, is too inconvenient to deserve examination.

      But as Al Gore has pointed out, the truth can be inconvenient.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Trump has made plenty of racist statements.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
  More than Jessie Jackson?


Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Is Jesse Jackson actually RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT?
Does Trump have to be MORE RACIST than Jesse Fucking Jackson for him to be guilty of race baiting?
Why do you think Jesse Jackson has a single thing to do with this?

Because I say he is about as relevant as Chairman Mao's brand of toothpaste.
Which is to say, not at all.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Is Jesse Jackson actually RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT?
He has.
Quote
Does Trump have to be MORE RACIST than Jesse Fucking Jackson for him to be guilty of race baiting?

No, but Jesse Jackson suffered a little for it , Trump seems to be suffering even less.


Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Jesse Jackson is not running now, and therefore is not germane to the topic.
Voters will decide what to make of Trump. I doubt he will get even the low percentage of the Hispanic and Black vote that Romney did.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Jesse Jackson is not running now, and therefore is not germane to the topic.
Voters will decide what to make of Trump. I doubt he will get even the low percentage of the Hispanic and Black vote that Romney did.

Why not?

Are minorities happy with the government they have been getting?

It would be amazing if very many of their votes were won with the slogan "More of the Same".

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
This country was founded to assure that rich people would rule and the rest of us would obey. The Constitution guarantees this. Trump will do nothing that will benefit  those that are not of the ruling class, there is at least the possibility that the majority will benefit with the Democrats. Trump will get even fewer of the votes of the dispossessed, who include nearly all the Blacks and Hispanics than Rawmoney did.

Most Americans will not benefit from a Republican government in any way. With the Democrats there is a small chance of some beneficial change.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
This country was founded to assure that rich people would rule and the rest of us would obey. The Constitution guarantees this.


Piffle , not anywhere near the truth.

Any seemingly solid argument for this falls apart at the election of Andrew Jackson, with Davy Crocket and company riding his coattails into the congress.

George Washington was not a hero only to the elite. Thomas Jefferson wrote volumes more than just the Declaration of independence  , his attitude can be examined in detail. Madison and Adams are well understood because they spent half of their lives explaining themselves. Accusing these guys of elitism is making a leap across a grand heap of evidence to the contrary.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
This is what Madison wrote:

The man who is possessed of wealth, who lolls on his sofa or rolls in his carriage, cannot judge the wants or feelings of the day-laborer. The government we mean to erect is intended to last for ages. The landed interest, at present, is prevalent; but in process of time, when we approximate to the states and kingdoms of Europe, — when the number of landholders shall be comparatively small, through the various means of trade and manufactures, will not the landed interest be overbalanced in future elections, and unless wisely provided against, what will become of your government? In England, at this day, if elections were open to all classes of people, the property of landed proprietors would be insecure. An agrarian law would soon take place. If these observations be just, our government ought to secure the permanent interests of the country against innovation. Landholders ought to have a share in the government, to support these invaluable interests, and to balance and check the other. They ought to be so constituted as to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority. The senate, therefore, ought to be this body; and to answer these purposes, they ought to have permanency and stability.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
  Madison seems to be making my point more than yours, right up to where the letters are in bold.
   Do you understand?

     I suppose you know that the Senate lost the confidence of the people about a century ago and the rules for choosing Senators were changed to make the Senate more representative of the people.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
This country was founded to assure that rich people would rule and the rest of us would obey. The Constitution guarantees this.

Not even close, as it guarantees no such thing.  What it guarantees is specific to what's actually written.....as in black & white, with nary a hint of any ambiguity

And to that end, we all are aware of the Bill of Rights (and how the left tries to trash it whenever it can), but did we all forget the preamble?  Let's put it up on screen:



Is that clear enough?

"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle