Author Topic: Liberal dilemma  (Read 4873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #30 on: May 17, 2016, 10:35:55 AM »
What the morons who push this PC crap fail to grasp is the law isn't intended to harass the so-called "transgendered", it's aimed at cross dressers and predators, who would use the PC madness as a cloak, to get their jollies.....or worse
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8013
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #31 on: May 17, 2016, 10:50:57 AM »
Now thats where the flaws is you lumped cross dressers with predators. If this were exclusively protection from predators it would have better legs to get the law through but thats not the case here .

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #32 on: May 17, 2016, 10:57:50 AM »
Can you supply a list of male-to-female crossdressing restroom rapists for us?

Rape is not so much a sex crime, it is a crime for men who seek to dominate women.  They are quite unlikely to put on womens' clothes in any circumstance.

Just as I presume, you are unlikely to  dress up like Kim Jung Il and go to the Mall to demonstrate to the public what a loser Kim is.

Crossdressing rapists are NOT an identifiable problem and we already have laws against rape and men who look like men who enter women's restrooms with evil intent.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #33 on: May 17, 2016, 11:10:09 AM »
Now thats where the flaws is you lumped cross dressers with predators.

Actually, it so happens, that I was listening to a "transgendered" (guy who believes himself to be a woman, and has gone thru surgery), who doesn't support this PC push, and cited specifically cross-dressers, as they apparently are men who simply like to dress up as woman.  Both groups, get their jollies by demeaning women, with predators obviously being a far worse sort of group
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #34 on: May 17, 2016, 11:11:10 AM »
Is he a restroom rapist?
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #35 on: May 17, 2016, 11:12:38 AM »
No, he a so called "transgendered"
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #36 on: May 17, 2016, 06:18:53 PM »
He lacks the equipment to be a restroom rapist then.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #37 on: May 17, 2016, 06:23:19 PM »
Nor was he commenting as one, Dr Deflection.  He was commenting as an acutal transgender
« Last Edit: May 17, 2016, 07:43:51 PM by sirs »
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #38 on: May 18, 2016, 12:17:02 AM »
Enforcing bathroom laws is symbolic. They are unenforceable.
I have no idea how successful Charlotte is or has been at attracting conventions. I do not think this particular ordinance was useful.


Exactly , the LGBT boosters of Charlotte are thick skulled, there is really no potential for success for either side in this .

It works well for most of us to be well behaved and respectful of each other, those who can't manage this, justify laws and enforcement of laws.


Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #39 on: May 18, 2016, 12:25:06 AM »
Transgendered restrooms rapists are not a problem.

Restroom rapists have never been a problem.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #40 on: May 18, 2016, 05:59:41 AM »
Transgendered restrooms rapists are not a problem.

Restroom rapists have never been a problem.

Who says they are?

A lot of us are raised to avoid public nudity, where partial nudity is unavoidable for necessary excretion there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Rapists are ignoring the rules anyway, one or two new rules more or less won't affect rapists directly. If a new rule makes a rape victim more vulnerable, or just feel more vulnerable this is a bad effect even if no actual rape occurs.

Where nudity is needed , it should be accepted with grace, what is the need here?

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #41 on: May 18, 2016, 10:40:53 AM »
Bingo!
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle

Christians4LessGvt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11139
    • View Profile
    • "The Religion Of Peace"
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #42 on: May 18, 2016, 11:02:48 AM »
JFK Wanted Men on Moon, Obama Wants Men in Women's Restroom
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Ronald Reagan - June 12, 1987

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #43 on: May 18, 2016, 01:11:55 PM »
Nudity is hardly a problem, since the issue is men in women's bathrooms, and women's bathrooms have stalls with closable and lockable doors.
You might get a glimpse of someone's pants around their ankles.'


The big issue involved in all of this is the fact that children are often bullies,and no one gets bullied more than the effeminate boys and I imagine that would include transsexuals as well. In my high school and junior high and the ones I taught in, locker rooms were where all the really serious bullying took place. Because the issue here is not protecting women from that rarest of beings, the crossdressing male rapist, but preventing children from not being bullied.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

sirs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27078
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Liberal dilemma
« Reply #44 on: May 18, 2016, 01:43:44 PM »
This has squat to do with bullying, or the WH would have made that the centerpiece to trying to justify their outrageous edict.  Assaults take place in women's restrooms, frequently.  This edict merely makes it easier for such events to happen.  A guy or boy need only cite "I identify with being a woman/girl", to gain entrance.  A pervert doesn't even need to assault anyone....they can stand in an ajoining stall, getting off on the woman in the stall right next to him.
"The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle