As FBI director Comey is being interviewed by a congressional hearing, what he's making clear is that his interpretation of the Federal statute, as it relates to "intent", is the intention involved doesn't require just maintaining highly classified material on an unsecured private server, doesn't require sending and receiving highly classified material on an unsecured server, but also requires the knowledge that what she was doing was wrong and unlawful. That's what he's using to compare her actions to others who have been prosecuted for far less. In those lesser cases, the people involved acknowledged what they were doing was unlawful and/or was caught in a lie during an official FBI/Justice Dept interview. In Clinton's case, the reason intent was not recognized, is that she was simply too dumb to grasp that what she was doing wrong and contrary to the very protections she herself signed that she'd follow
I see the approach Comey is bringing to the table....pathological liar, reckless, careless, and dumb to boot. Brilliant nominee Democrats
