Hillary "ground game" in Ohio!

[Christians4LessGvt]

Investigating Hillary Clinton's Ohio Enthusiasm: The Invisibles VS The Deplorables

Posted on September 18, 2016   

Against the backdrop of a looming monster vote, and with the media beginning to discuss the "enthusiasm gap", it can be challenging to get real reports not filtered and spun through the prism of the mainstream media.

Subsequently, a deplorable in Ohio wanted to check out the reality:

How much actual enthusiasm for Hillary Clinton exists today in Ohio?

To find the answer, one deplorable supporter went to a scheduled 1:00pm Hillary Clinton outreach event (door knocking) in Delaware Ohio.

Here's the result:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-HZMqIkGoU

[sirs]

I thought it was the Illegals vs the Deplorables       

[Plane]

   Trump seems to have the enthusiastic youth and the Republican in habit.

   Hillary is not generating a lot of excitement in spite of spending record amounts of money to gen up what she has.


      This really means that huge spending really is not dependable for buying votes , very contrary to the conventional thinking and I for one am very glad to see it.

        I would have liked to have seen it in back of someone more inspiring than Donald Trump , but just to see this embarrassment for the powerful and moneyed is very pleasing.

[Xavier_Onassis]

You want to see a lot of embarrassed people, elect the egomaniacal boor and blowhard Trump.

Your premise that we should vote to feel glee at someone being embarrassed for a few minutes is erroneous ans well, just flat-plant stupid.

[Plane]

    I think the worst embarrassment potential would be with President Hillary.

      She is more than a little foolish, and we know all of her tricks from experience.

[Xavier_Onassis]

Trump asks "why can't we use our nukes?"
Why would any sane contender not understand that?

[Plane]

Trump asks "why can't we use our nukes?"
Why would any sane contender not understand that?

What could you mean?

The use of atomic bombs is a very grave concern , but if they cannot be used under any circumstance , we have wasted a tremendous amount of money on them.

Why indeed has no President ever demolished them unilaterally?

[Xavier_Onassis]

We have indeed destroyed nukes, as have the Russians.
They are a DETERRENT.  One does not use DETERRENTS. They work best when their presence is known and no one has to mention them.

[Plane]

I was always pretty sure that the president was willing to use Atomic weapons in extreme circumstances.


The needful extreme might be further out for one than another.

For Truman beating the Japanese was worthy of using atom bombs , but beating the Koreans was not.

So there is a line there, a place to balance the cost.



What deterrence would   there be in weapons  that we were pledged to never use under any circumstance?

[sirs]

They are a DETERRENT.  One does not use DETERRENTS. They work best when their presence is known and no one has to mention them.

A friendly reminder, never hurts

[Xavier_Onassis]

Asking "why don't we use our nukes" in the same way someone says,  "why don't you wear your Christmas sweater?"  as Trump did is hardly helpful.

[sirs]

Sure it is..... its a reminder who's in a position to back up what they say

[Plane]

Asking "why don't we use our nukes" in the same way someone says,  "why don't you wear your Christmas sweater?"  as Trump did is hardly helpful.

   Perhaps there should be a good answer for this question when it is asked of a leader who might have opportunity to use a atom bomb.

    Mr. Kim is there a particular reason not to use your atomic weapons?

[Xavier_Onassis]

If I were a North Korean I would certainly not vote for Kim. But then again, it would make no difference.
The way Trump said this was the problem.

I do not think the USA needs its own Kim Jong Un.

[sirs]

That's why we're not going to elect Clinton, and her package of Kim Jong Un's level of corruption