Round 1 to Clinton

[sirs]

Not 1 question on the Clinton Foundation, but several minutes exercised on both the non-existent Birther issue & Trump's tax returns, that neither of which he answered very well

2 incredible opening, literally softball, questions for Trump to hammer Clinton's piss poor judgement and incompetence with national security, via her unsecured e-mail system & subsequent destruction of evidence in the face of a congressional subpoena....and he failed to to get anything of substance started

No wonder Clinton was smiling

[Plane]

   I didn't like His explanation of why his tax records are out of sight.

   I didn't hear her explanation of e-mail or foreign policy failures.


     Why do either of them get a point?


      Who really is getting energized to vote out of anything but loathing of one or the other?

[Xavier_Onassis]

Imagine Trump stiffing even dishwasher because he did not perform their duties. The turkey claims that he somehow has a right to pay less than promised or not pay at all if he doesn't like the work.

And if he pays ZERO in taxes, that shows how smart he is. 
As hard as he may, he cannot spin that into an act of patriotism.

He had better cough up his tax returns.
He gets audited every year because he is what is known as a gonif.

Clinton clearly won thus debate. The Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar went up in value in response. Wall Street knows a gonif when it sees one.

No reports of Michael Bloomberg stiffing his employees, declaring bankruptcy, or being sued by 3000 people. 

[Plane]

Clinton clearly won thus debate. The Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar went up in value in response. Wall Street knows a gonif when it sees one.

Are you admitting that foreign currencies rise against the dollar when it seems as if Hillary R. Clinton is likely to win?

[Xavier_Onassis]

Admit?  WTF?  I am not responsible. It is simply an indication that the fear that Trump would be elected would destabilize the Mexican and Canadian economies.

Trump is full of shit to say that countries deliberately devalue their currencies. They can't do this by much, because they would have to buy dollars with money from their treasuries to keep the price where they wanted it. The market determines exchange rates, no matter what any government does. If not the market, then the black market.

Trump does not know diddly about macroeconomics.

[sirs]

Nor does Clinton.  She also doesn't know about truth, honesty, integrity, nor national security

But she has incompetence down, in spades

[Christians4LessGvt]

Michael Moore: "Trump Won The Debate"

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/27/michael-moore-says-trump-won-the-debate/

[Christians4LessGvt]

[Xavier_Onassis]

Clinton has not been incompetent at all. She got China and Russia to impose sanctions on Iran, she got the generals to hold elections in Burma and to turn the famous dissident loose.

The economy ran better when Bill Clinton was president than it did during any time after Eisenhower.

[sirs]

wow...trying to match her whoppers, with one of your own??  That's her entire defense to the FBI....that she was literally too incompotent (and reckless) in realizing as SoS, that what she was doing with her e-mail server was completely contrary to what public officials are to adhere to, but worse, compromising National Security.  Compromising to the point that if she had done this if an employee of the FBI, would have had all her security clearances revoked, and disciplinary actions imposed......if not fired

But she's a Clinton, so laws and rules don't apply to her

[Christians4LessGvt]

[Xavier_Onassis]

There are very good  reasons why sane, literate people oppose Donald "I alone can fix it" Trump.  He is a conman and an egomaniacal jerk. You morons would want equal approval given to Mussolini or Hitler.

[sirs]

And there are very good reasons why sane, literate people oppose Hillary "my word is the gold standard" Clinton.  She is an incompotent, reckless, and thoroughly corrupt liar.  And your grasping at Hitler & Mussolini straws, validates precisely the level of desperation you've reached

[Xavier_Onassis]

You are far less literate than you think, sirs.

[sirs]

Says the linguistics professor with prescious little grasp of language context.  Point being, as "bad" as you proclaim Trump to be, the argument can be credibly made as to how exponentially worse Clinton would be