Author Topic: Walter Reed general loses his command  (Read 1383 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Walter Reed general loses his command
« on: March 01, 2007, 04:58:05 PM »
By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer

WASHINGTON - The Army said Thursday that the two-star general in charge of Walter Reed Army Medical Center has been relieved of command following disclosures about inadequate treatment of wounded soldiers.

The firing of Maj. Gen. George W. Weightman, who was commanding general of the North Atlantic Regional Medical Command as well as Walter Reed hospital, was announced by Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey.

In a brief announcement, the Army said service leaders had "lost trust and confidence" in Weightman's leadership abilities "to address needed solutions for soldier outpatient care." He had headed Walter Reed since Aug. 25, 2006.

The Army and the Defense Department launched a series of investigations after The Washington Post published a series of stories last week that documented problems in soldiers' housing and in the medical bureaucracy at Walter Reed, which has been called the Army's premier caregiver for soldiers wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan.

After a visit to the hospital compound last Friday, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said those found to have been responsible for the problems at Walter Reed would be "held accountable."

On Thursday he issued a brief statement endorsing Harvey's action.

"The care and welfare of our wounded men and women in uniform demand the highest standard of excellence and commitment that we can muster as a government," Gates said. "When this standard is not met, I will insist on swift and direct corrective action and, where appropriate, accountability up the chain of command."

It was not clear whether Gates insisted on Weightman's firing. A Pentagon official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, said Gates was "actively involved" in the firing decision.

A Pentagon spokesman, Bryan Whitman, said before Weightman's firing was announced that an outside review panel created by Gates was holding its first meeting Friday at the Pentagon. Headed by two former Army secretaries, Togo West and Jack Marsh, the panel is to review treatment and administrative processes at Walter Reed and at the National Naval Medical Center at Bethesda, Md. Gates has instructed the group to report its findings publicly within 45 days.

Being relieved of command means Weightman is almost certain to have lost his future in the Army.

A native of Vermont, he graduated from West Point in 1973 and got his medical degree from the University of Vermont. He later served as the surgeon for the 82nd Airborne Division, including during Desert Storm.

He has held a number of medical commands, including service as a leading surgeon during the initial stages of the Iraq war.

Weightman's duties at Walter Reed will be assumed temporarily by Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley, the commander of U.S. Medical Command, until a permanent replacement is found, Harvey said.

"The Army is moving quickly to address issues regarding outpatient care at Walter Reed Army Medical Center," the announcement said.

Last week the Army took disciplinary action against several lower-level soldiers at Walter Reed, but officials have declined to publicly confirm any details of those actions.

The problems at Walter Reed pertain not to the quality of medical treatment for wounded soldiers but rather to the level of care for those who are well enough to be outpatients, living in Army housing at Walter Reed. One building was singled out in the Post reports as suffering from ill-repair, including mold on interior walls.

The Army also has acknowledged problems with the system it uses to evaluate wounded soldiers in determining whether they are well enough to return to active duty.

At a breakfast meeting with reporters Thursday, in which he refused to discuss any aspect of the Walter Reed investigations, Harvey said the Army also was reviewing conditions at its medical centers elsewhere in the country. He would not be more specific.


"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Walter Reed general loses his command
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2007, 05:09:37 PM »
Hopefully the next waive of firings will involve staff directly responsible for the neglect.

yellow_crane

  • Guest
Re: Walter Reed general loses his command
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2007, 08:03:38 PM »
Hopefully the next waive of firings will involve staff directly responsible for the neglect.


Staff at that one particular building should be shitcanned for neglect.

The base commander should be shitcanned for another kind of neglect--neglecting to ensure that his people were performing.

Then again, if lack of funding was the cause, and local staff were reporting but saw no change, they should be lauded, and the money trail investigated thoroughly to see where the funds went.   This administration, let's face it, has a lot of missing funds and personnel incompetence.

The fact that George W. Bush told the dandy Mr. Brown:  "And Brownie, you did a heck of a job . . . " proves that not only is there rampant incompetence but also that the only reaction to the truth coming out is to spin it over.

If it were not for the function of 'spinning,' this administration would actually have to be accountable. 

All that needs to be done to address this tumor on the body politic is for the press to come forward and start to identify just what spin is.

I do not hold my breath.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Walter Reed general loses his command
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2007, 08:15:59 PM »
Quote
Staff at that one particular building should be shitcanned for neglect.

Common ground

Quote
The base commander should be shitcanned for another kind of neglect--neglecting to ensure that his people were performing.

Common ground

Quote
Then again, if lack of funding was the cause, and local staff were reporting but saw no change, they should be lauded, and the money trail investigated thoroughly to see where the funds went.   

Let's see where the trail leads. Let's see to whom they reported it, what steps were taken at that junture and why outside help wasn't sought early in the game.

I am curious why our intrepid reporters were so late to the story. Targets not big enough. Cionditions not bad enough? Neglect not long enough?

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Walter Reed general loses his command
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2007, 04:18:31 AM »
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016