Author Topic: Jurors: Sex Offender Didn't Rape Teens  (Read 1547 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Jurors: Sex Offender Didn't Rape Teens
« on: April 24, 2007, 12:11:59 PM »
Apr 24, 8:55 AM (ET)

By MEG KINNARD

DARLINGTON, S.C. (AP) - Hands swollen from where they had ripped off their duct tape bonds, two teen girls told police a harrowing tale last year: A man they knew had kidnapped them and raped them in an underground bunker near their mobile home.

Their account launched a four-day manhunt, led to the arrest of a convicted sex offender and helped pass legislation that would allow the death penalty for some repeat child molesters.

But the case against Kenneth Glenn Hinson unraveled Monday when a jury, after four hours of deliberations, acquitted him of criminal sexual conduct, kidnapping, and assault and battery with intent to kill.

Families of the accusers wept in the courtroom. Surprised prosecutors said they thought enough evidence had been presented to ensure a guilty verdict.

"We are shocked and stunned. We believed Mr. Hinson was guilty as charged. We still believe he is guilty as charged," said Attorney General Henry McMaster, who helped prosecute the case.

Hinson, 48, had maintained his innocence since his arrest. During the six-day trial, he testified that he had consensual sex with both girls just hours before the alleged attack and built the bunker to hide drugs. Both girls were 17 at the time, over the legal age of consent in South Carolina, which is 16.

His defense attorney picked apart the girls' stories and questioned why Hinson's fingerprints couldn't be found on the duct tape.

The victory for Hinson, who served nine years in prison for raping a 12-year-old girl, is a high-profile defeat for McMaster. As authorities combed the rural northeast corner of South Carolina in the days leading to Hinson's arrest, McMaster blasted his release, saying that if he had been required to serve his full, 20-year sentence, perhaps he would not have been free to rape again.

McMaster was also vocal in his criticism of a trial judge who chose not to recommend that Hinson be committed to a state rehabilitation program for sexually violent predators.

Two committees consisting of state officials, a defense attorney and a judge had recommended that Hinson enter the program. Judge Edward Cottingham - a retired but active judge - rejected arguments that Hinson had a mental or personality abnormality that might lead him to offend again.

The day Hinson was captured, Cottingham said he did not recall Hinson's case specifically but noted that state law requires prosecutors to show probable cause a person will commit another sexual assault.

After the verdict Monday, Hinson lawyer Rick Hoefer said he was pleased with the jury's decision but felt Cottingham was unfairly criticized by prosecutors and the media for his decision.

"They made a big deal and said, if he had been declared a sexually violent predator, this never would have happened. Well, this jury just said this never happened," Hoefer said. "I think somebody ought to acknowledge that Judge Cottingham, who is a good and honorable man, is entitled to an apology."

Hinson still faces three burglary counts in connection with this case, as well as a felony weapons possession charge that could carry a possible life sentence. He was place in federal custody after Monday's verdict was read, but smiled as he was escorted from the court.

"I think the verdict says it all," he said.

Article
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8020
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Jurors: Sex Offender Didn't Rape Teens
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2007, 03:36:26 PM »
off subject
16????
I`m gonna sound prudish,but that`s young
I think any sex before 18 is wrong.
this is a fact
not a single scene on tv has ever encouraged underage(-18) sex
people are totally misinformed say tv encouraged it.
every scence that has it has a negative reaction afterwards

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Jurors: Sex Offender Didn't Rape Teens
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2007, 04:00:57 PM »
16????
I`m gonna sound prudish,but that`s young

Many states have an age of majority that is below 18.

Prior to the 20th century, in most places you were considered an adult at 14 or 15 and expected to support yourself by that time.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

hnumpah

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
  • You have another think coming. Use it.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Jurors: Sex Offender Didn't Rape Teens
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2007, 04:56:02 PM »
In the US, the lowest legal age I could find was 14.

In some countries, especially in Latin America, the age of consent is 12.

Some countries don't have a minimum age as long as the parties are married.
"I love WikiLeaks." - Donald Trump, October 2016

kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8020
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Jurors: Sex Offender Didn't Rape Teens
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2007, 05:38:22 PM »
I`m just used to 18 being the legal age.
even that age seems abit young
even if I had the opportunity
i would not go out with someone around that age.
26 at the very youngest for me.
but I`m 42 so it should be ok i don`t hang out with young girls of any age.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Jurors: Sex Offender Didn't Rape Teens
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2007, 06:51:54 PM »
Would these girls really have falsely accused this guy for the purpose of getting him put in prison for the rest of his life?



kimba1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8020
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Jurors: Sex Offender Didn't Rape Teens
« Reply #6 on: April 24, 2007, 07:05:15 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzen_Johnson

not impposible,but seemingly improbable.

these things are creepily not as clear cut as it seems.