Author Topic: Genuine Alert or Shady Manipulation, or Points in Between?  (Read 579 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

domer

  • Guest
Today's news of allegedly provable Iranian interference in Iraq in the form of palpable assistance to SUNNI insurgents is a chilling reminder of the hornets' nest our invasion of Iraq has bestirred. Clearly, support for the Sunni's, ever more clearly than for the Shiites alone, would seem to signal a commitment by Iran to roil the Iraqi waters sufficiently so as to perpetuate the civil war, and maybe even bring it to culmination with a failed state openly under the sway of its Persian neighbor.

This presents a major complication regarding our military mission in Iraq. If withdrawal was palatable in a situation of "free-wheeling civil war" in Iraq, with hopes that an acceptable resolution was possible if only after a very bloody interlude, then the "resolution" that seems to face us now is a grandly expanded Iranian influence, nuclear weapons "in hand."

Now, I won't rush to judgment on the future of our military commitment, but I think it is the hallmark of prudence to send a general alert for purposes of prevention or, failing that, preparation.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Genuine Alert or Shady Manipulation, or Points in Between?
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2007, 01:42:37 AM »
I suppose that a rapid withdrawal could cause a flow of Sunni refugees into Saudi Arabia ,and Saudis might feel obliged to aid the Sunni.

We could leave and return after the sides have weakened each other?


It would be better by far for the people of Iraq to realise who it is really who wants the fighting to increase and why ,sooner than that.