Author Topic: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives  (Read 6442 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2006, 06:59:55 PM »
<<What was the census method used to find the number of killed Iriquis?>>

I believe that the polling technique was based on asking people if anyone in their family had died by violence and how.  Of course the actual polling would have been a lot more sophisticated than that in its methodology - - we are dealing with one of America's premier medical schools, Johns Hopkins, and they would not want to compromise their academic reputation by shoddy polling methods.  The Iraq Body Count site itself acknowledges that its own lower figures represent a small portion of the actual deaths, most of which cannot be objectively confirmed.


<<If our war in Iraq has killed a half million , counting all the deaths caused directly and indirectly by the war , includeing the few thousand we wanted to kill and the thousands more killed while supporting us , then we have seen a quarter as many killed as Saddam is responsible for , that number being two million.>>

This is truly insane logic. You're better than Saddam because he killed more people than you did?  Do you mean to say that if Saddam is 100% on a scale of absolute evil, that Bush is only a 25? 

<<If Saddams past sins were not enough reason to invade , his unrepentant attitude and ambition to do even more were worse.>>

And your evidence of his ambition to "do even more" is . . . .?

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #16 on: October 11, 2006, 07:14:10 PM »
"And your evidence of his ambition to "do even more" is . . . .?"


[][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][][]


The statements Saddam would make to his party and his people , he was fond of the Idea of modifying the borders of Iraq into a more logical grouping the most logical grouping of course included the territory of neighboring countrys .

Is this really arguable?

   Saddam several times actually did make war for the purpose of aquireing territory , he had a giant mural of himself made on the reconstruction of Babilon that showed himself shakeing hands with Nebicanezzar, he had programs of produceing WMD and a history of useing WMD untill he was defeated in 91 and then he produced a history of being unco-operative with inspections.

     The Sanctions are blamed by some  for killing a Million Iriquis , for this and other reasons the sanctions could not continue , but neither couold Saddam be released to continue doing what he was doing all of the time that he was not being held from expantion.

If Saddam was not going to be the Hitler or Napolion of his dreams , he was at least going to try to be the James Polk of Iran.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2006, 07:40:15 PM »
<<The statements Saddam would make to his party and his people , he was fond of the Idea of modifying the borders of Iraq into a more logical grouping the most logical grouping of course included the territory of neighboring countrys .

<<Is this really arguable?>>

Sure it's really arguable.  When was the last time he said he wanted to modify Iraq's borders?  More to the point, since he had twice tried and failed to do it by force, when was the last time he said he wanted to modify Iraq's borders by force?

<<he had a giant mural of himself made on the reconstruction of Babilon that showed himself shakeing hands with Nebicanezzar . . .>>

Which in the real world is evidence of exactly nothing.  I don't think Nebuchadnezzar was in the hanit of shaking hands much, you probably made his acquaintance by grovelling towards him on your belly, face into the sand, till he graciously allowed you to kiss his feet.

<<he had programs of produceing WMD and a history of useing WMD untill he was defeated in 91 and then he produced a history of being unco-operative with inspections.>>

Again, proof of basically nothing.  Don't amount to a hill a beans.  Wouldn't convict a chicken-eatin hound dog on evidence like that.

<<If Saddam was not going to be the Hitler or Napolion of his dreams , he was at least going to try to be the James Polk of Iran.>>

LOL.  He never heard of James Polk.  Saddam is a big student of Stalin.  Got a whole library of Stalin books.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2006, 07:57:08 PM »
"LOL.  He never heard of James Polk.  Saddam is a big student of Stalin.  Got a whole library of Stalin books."

[][][][][][][][][][][][]

Oh?

Could you tell  me more about that?


Keep in mind that I have about the same esteem for Stalin as I do for Napolion and Hitler.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #19 on: October 11, 2006, 09:32:15 PM »
<<Could you tell  me more about that [Saddam's admiration for Stalin]?>>

Not much to tell.  I've seen it mentioned two or three times.  Probably if you googled Saddam and Stalin together, you'd come up with some of the sources.  It's logical, if you recall that Ba'ath is an Arab Socialist party.

I've never seen any public commentary made by Saddam on the subject of Stalin, so I'm not sure how politically correct it was to be pro-Stalin during Saddam's years in power.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #20 on: October 11, 2006, 09:45:30 PM »
This at least explains the moustache.

Lanya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #21 on: October 12, 2006, 01:02:13 AM »
What was the census method used to find the number of killed Iriquis?


If our war in Iraq has killed a half million , counting all the deaths caused directly and indirectly by the war , includeing the few thousand we wanted to kill and the thousands more killed while supporting us , then we have seen a quarter as many killed as Saddam is responsible for , that number being two million.


If Saddams past sins were not enough reason to invade , his unrepentant attitude and ambition to do even more were worse.
________________________________________

Video: Pollster Zogby '95 percent' sure of 650,000 Iraqi death toll

RAW STORY
Published: Wednesday October 11, 2006

Expert pollster John Zogby is "95 percent certain" that around 650,000 Iraqis civilians have died since the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. A new study by Iraqi physicians and Americans from John Hopkins University polled 1,800 Iraqis to calculate an approximate number of casualties since the beginning of the war.

In an interview on CNN International, Zogby explains that the methodology used in the study is very reliable. "The methodology, from what I've seen of the survey, is quite good," he remarked. He is also in agreement with the study's estimate of 650,000 casualties, saying, "I can't vouch for it 100 percent, but I'll vouch for it 95 percent, which is as good as it gets in survey research."

At a press conference earlier in the day, President Bush said that he did not agree with the study's results, saying, "I think that methodology has been pretty well discredited."

A transcript of John Zogby's interview with CNN International follows the video.



TRANSCRIPT

VASSILEVA: Well, that figure is some 655,000 Iraqis. That's far greater than any number we've heard so far.

HOLMES: Yes, multiples higher. That's right. Back in December, U.S. President Bush, for example, estimated about 30,000 Iraqi civilians had lost their lives. That's about 20 times lower than the deaths cited in this report.

VASSILEVA: A private Iraq body count group estimated the number of civilian deaths falls between about 44,000 and 49,000. It bases its statistics on media and eyewitness accounts.

HOLMES: All right. We are joined now from our Washington bureau by John Zogby. He's president and CEO of Zogby International, that conducts political polls in the U.S., as well as opinion polls in Iraq.

And thanks for your time.

You do this for a living. Why such a massive increase in the numbers in the numbers? Is the methodology good?

JOHN ZOGBY, ZOGBY INTERNATIONAL: The methodology of the survey, I think, from what I've seen so far is quite good, following all the rules of random sampling to a degree that it's possible in a country like Iraq, and cluster sampling. zeroing in on sampling points that are representative.

I think where some of the disconnect may very well be is that this was indeed according to the methodology statement that I read a nationwide survey, including clusters of areas that are not within the daily purview of where the media are and where many public officials are who report those body counts.

And so, I mean, translated, the media clustered in about five or six cities, and that's where much of the body count comes from. There is so much more to Iraq than just five or six cities.

HOLMES: You make a really good point. I've been there many times, and as recently as last month. When we were there then, we were talking about these numbers, and how rubbery, if you like, they are. The U.S. would say numbers are down, and then you'd find out they weren't counting car bomb victims. And as you say, the Baghdad morgue is perhaps the biggest source of death tolls, but it's just one morgue. And a lot of people aren't taken to that morgue. Do you think that this could really be an accurate figure?

ZOGBY: I can't vouch for it 100 percent, but I'll vouch for it 95 percent, which is as good as it gets in survey research. I know PIPA, the group at the university that conducted the polling in the U.S. I know of the group that -- the university that published and conducted the survey on the Iraq side. In fact, we've used them ourselves. These are good researchers. I have read their methodology statement. It is a good one and a sound one.

I don't know the specific questions they asked. One of the things I'd like to know is, above and beyond the count, where they place blame, where the public places blame for the deaths. That can get a little squidgy, in the sense that you're going to get a lot more people blaming allied forces, blaming America than might be directly involved in the killings.

But in terms of the sampling of methodology that was used, this is sound and this is going to generate quite a bit of debate.

I don't think that there's anybody in my business who responsibly believes that 30,000 to 40,000 or 45,000 Iraqis have been killed since March of 2003.

HOLMES: Right. That was always a nonsense figure. I mean, you just needed to do the math day to day with 100 people being found in the streets some days.

ZOGBY: Excuse me, Michael. But 100 people found in Baghdad, or Mosul or Al Ramadi (ph).

HOLMES: Yes, absolutely. Actually normally just in Baghdad. And there are a couple of areas in Iraq that are far more violent than Baghdad itself, believe it or not.

Just finally, John, do you think this group being fairly reputable. The number I saw being criticized. The number of the sampling, I think was 1800 people, but that's a decent-sized sample. We recorded our own CNN poll today there was only 1,000 people.

ZOGBY: And CNN, and my company are others are able to call U.S. elections and European elections with pinpoint precision using a sample of a thousand; 1,800-plus sample in a country like Iraq is more than enough to do the job and to get the ballpark figure that they got here.

HOLMES: Right. Very, very important coming from you, John. Appreciate that. John Zogby of Zogby International. A lot of criticism over this report already from the White House, saying it's not credible. But as you say, there's a lot there to be taken very seriously.

Thanks, John.
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Video_Expert_Zogby_95_sure_of_1011.html
Planned Parenthood is America’s most trusted provider of reproductive health care.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #22 on: October 12, 2006, 12:44:26 PM »
<<At a press conference earlier in the day, President Bush said that he did not agree with the study's results, saying, "I think that methodology has been pretty well discredited.">>

That figures.  The guy who's SO concerned about them getting "democracy" that he'll sacrifice thousands of US lives and hundreds of billions of dollars for this worthy project, doesn't even bother to keep a body count of how many of them get killed in the process, but the Great Statistician nevertheless opines that the Johns Hopkins University's Faculty of Public Health is using "discredited methodology."  What's that, Bush Lie No. 6,841?  (as if anyone could count 'em all)

Lanya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #23 on: October 13, 2006, 12:39:41 AM »
This is an interesting writer, Lindsay Beyerstein, on this topic:

Innumerate cowards recoil from the facts: 655,000 dead Iraqis

The right wing noise machine is clanking and shuddering. They're outraged about this study, published in the Lancet. The study estimated that 665,000 more Iraqis have died after the US invasion than would have been expected based on pre-invasion death rates. (I discuss the study in more detail here)

Here are today's talking points. Or should we say talking flails? There aren't many actual points here:

1. 655,000 is an awfully big number. That would mean that this war killed a whole lot of people.  (Jane Galt)

2. If 770 extra people were dying in Iraq every day, why don't we hear about them on the news?  (Gateway Pundit)

3. The study was published before the election. (Instapundit) (Political Pitbull)

4. The peer-reviewed paper must be bogus because the editor of the Lancet goes to anti-war rallies. (Anti-Idiotarian Rotweiler)

5. The pre-invasion death rates are too low. Surely, Saddam was filling mass graves two months before the invasion. (Chuck Simmins)

6. Those peacenik scientists just wish there were more dead Iraqis. ("When the statistics announced by hospitals and military here, or even by the UN, did not satisfy their lust for more deaths, they resorted to mathematics to get a fake number that satisfies their sadistic urges," Omar Fadil.)

7. I just know the study's wrong, but I can't figure out how. Math people? (Michelle Malkin)

8. Sure the study's methodology is standard for public health resesarch. But don't forget that public health is a leftwing plot. (Medpundit)

9. These "statisticians" say that you can take a small sample from a large population and learn a lot about the whole population. As if.  I'll believe those 665,000 Iraqis are dead when they tell me so. (Tim Blair)

Cowards, all of them. They own this war, but they won't face up to the fact that their little adventure helped kill over half a million people.

More debunking from Tim Lambert, Appletreeblog, and Liberal Avenger. Stone Court scrutinizes Jane Galt.
http://majikthise.typepad.com/majikthise_/2006/10/innumerate_cowa.html
Planned Parenthood is America’s most trusted provider of reproductive health care.

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #24 on: October 13, 2006, 01:26:21 AM »
If my math is correct we have a kill ratio of 218 to 1.

Anyone remember what it was in Nam?

(waits patiently for Mikey to clarify that most of the Iraqi deaths came at the hands of brave insurgent freedom fighters and not at the hands of cowardly american soldiers)


Lanya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #25 on: October 13, 2006, 01:35:12 AM »
If my math is correct we have a kill ratio of 218 to 1.

Anyone remember what it was in Nam?

(waits patiently for Mikey to clarify that most of the Iraqi deaths came at the hands of brave insurgent freedom fighters and not at the hands of cowardly american soldiers)


______________________________

http://billmon.org/archives/002822.html

[]Knowing what we do now, containment definitely looks like the more humane alternative.

The final issue to be considered, I suppose, is one of moral purpose. Saddam was a ruthless psychopath who killed without mercy in order to safeguard his tenuous grip on power. His sons were sadistic morons who killed for pleasure as well as business. Jointly, they owned and operated a machine built for just one purpose: to liquidate the regime's opponents and terrorize any potential ones.

Shrub, on the other hand, claims the mantle of liberator. He proclaims his desire to bring the blessings of democracy and freedom (not to mention American-style capitalism) to Iraq. By his lights, I suppose you could say he's tried -- even if the Cheney Administration's true motives were a good deal more cynical than Shrub's canned rhetoric. Either way, I don't really think the goal of the American intervention in Iraq was or is to rule through Saddam-style terror.

And yet, in his own deluded and inarticulate way, Shrub is starting to sound like a Leninist in his willingness to break eggs (or at least see them get broken) if that's what it takes to keep his liberation fantasy -- which is really a personal power fantasy -- alive. And so we get bizarre statements like this one:

    I am, you know, amazed that this is a society which so wants to be free that they’re willing to — you know, that there’s a level of violence that they tolerate.

[]

The moral of the story, I guess, is that you don't need to be an inhuman monster to cause an inhuman amount of death, destruction and suffering. You don't even need evil -- ignorance and arrogance and incompetence can manage the job quite nicely. But, as I've said before, it does requires a rare combination of those qualities to take a situation like Saddam's Iraq and make it worse.

The numbers may be (and will be) debated, but at this point they strongly suggest that Shrub and company have managed to do just that -- or will, in the fullness of time.

[]
Planned Parenthood is America’s most trusted provider of reproductive health care.

Amianthus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7574
  • Bring on the flames...
    • View Profile
    • Mario's Home Page
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #26 on: October 13, 2006, 01:41:03 AM »
Anyone remember what it was in Nam?

From overall numbers, it was about 3.7:1.

Of course, most of the dead on "our" side were S. Vietnamese.

Some individual units during Nam got as high as 500:1.
Do not anticipate trouble, or worry about what may never happen. Keep in the sunlight. (Benjamin Franklin)

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: New Survey - Iraq Invasion Cost Over Half Million Iraqi Lives
« Reply #27 on: October 13, 2006, 01:47:23 AM »
Way I look at it, even if the number is grossly inflated, the days of reckoning are most assuredly here.

The Iraqi' are a violent lot. Perhaps we should rethink arming and training them.