Author Topic: Budget Cut Will Delay Anti-Missile Lase on commerical jets  (Read 1395 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mr_Perceptive

  • Guest
Budget Cut Will Delay Anti-Missile Lase on commerical jets
« on: September 05, 2007, 12:45:10 AM »
Budget Cut Will Delay Anti-Missile Laser
Tuesday September 4, 4:38 pm ET
By Donna Borak, AP Business Writer 
Boeing Team Warns Budget Cuts on Anti-Missile Aircraft Could Delay Schedule Up to 2 Years

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A Boeing Co. executive on Tuesday warned that proposed budget cuts by U.S. lawmakers could delay the completion of an anti-missile aircraft by two years.
Both the Senate and House Armed Services committees have slashed the president's fiscal 2008 proposed budget request of $549 million for the airborne laser program, or ABL, that will be used to thwart enemy missiles in the sky. In July, the House Appropriations committee agreed to a smaller cut of $51 million from the program.

Boeing and its teammates Northrop Grumman Corp. and Lockheed Martin Corp. are awaiting the Senate Appropriations committee to finalize its budget by the end of the month.

Greg Hyslop, a Boeing vice president, told reporters in a conference call that the level of cuts by both committees would delay the company's ability to complete the program by at least two years.

Hyslop said in order to stay on track it will need the full funding of the president's budget request.

The airborne laser program, which is being installed on a modified Boeing 747 aircraft, is designed to detect, track and engage a ballistic missile from a rogue state in the sky.

On Friday, the Missile Defense Agency said the Boeing-led team sailed through initial testing of the anti-missile aircraft on Aug. 23 at Edwards Air Force Base in California. The aircraft completed 48 flight test missions and fired its laser more than 200 times, according to the agency.

The next phase of testing will begin in late 2008 using Northrop's high-energy laser. The companies have already begun to install the upgraded laser at Edwards Air Force Base, according to Boeing.

Shares of Boeing fell 79 cents to $95.91 in late afternoon trading, while shares of Lockheed fell 15 cents to $98.99. Shares of Northrop fell 40 cents to $78.44.


« Last Edit: September 05, 2007, 01:09:00 AM by BT »

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Budget Cut Will Delay Anti-Missile Lase on commerical jets
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2007, 12:40:27 AM »
If the next generation of Laser could be installed on smaller aircraft , it might be better to consentrate the resorces and effort on improveing and minitureizeing the lazer rather than buying the big Boeings.


On the other hand, if we need it sooner rather than later ,we may regret not building the bird in hand.

Mr_Perceptive

  • Guest
Re: Budget Cut Will Delay Anti-Missile Lase on commerical jets
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2007, 07:31:13 PM »
Excellent point.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Budget Cut Will Delay Anti-Missile Lase on commerical jets
« Reply #3 on: September 13, 2007, 01:05:55 AM »
Boeing doesn't build any small planes.

To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Budget Cut Will Delay Anti-Missile Lase on commerical jets
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2007, 03:13:12 AM »
Boeing doesn't build any small planes.

To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

The Laser doesn't depend on the brand of aircraft , it just can't be put on a small one right now.

The energy source for this laser is chemical , two highly energetic chemicals are combined in the laseing chamber so that it runs like a rocket engine , at the least this requires some big tanks.

Other parts of the system might be miniaturized but decreasing the tanks would decrease the number of shots it could fire.

There are other principals for operating lasers so it is still possible that a better and smaller design can be developed.