“Liberals don’t even know what they mean by ‘hypocrite’ anymore. It’s just a word they throw out in a moment of womanly pique, like ‘extremist’ —or, come to think of it, ‘gay.’ How is [Larry] Craig a ‘hypocrite,’ much less a ‘blatant hypocrite’? Assuming the worst about Craig, the Senate has not held a vote on outlawing homosexual impulses. It voted on gay marriage. Craig not only opposes gay marriage, he’s in a heterosexual marriage with kids. Talk about walking the walk! Did Craig propose marriage to the undercover cop? If not, I’m not seeing the ‘hypocrisy.’ And why is it ‘homophobic’ for Senate Republicans to look askance at sex in public bathrooms? Is [The New York] Times claiming that sodomy in public bathrooms is the essence of being gay? I thought gays just wanted to get married to one another and settle down in the suburbs so they could visit each other in the hospital. Liberals have no idea what they think about homosexuality, which is why their arguments are completely contradictory. They gay-bait Republicans with abandon—and then turn around and complain about homophobia. They call Larry Craig a ‘deviant’ based on accusations that he attempted to solicit sex in a public bathroom—and then ferociously attack efforts to prevent people from having sex in public bathrooms. They say people are born gay—and then they say it’s the celibacy requirement that turns Catholic priests gay... Unlike liberals, the ‘family values caucus’ that the Times loathes has only one position on homosexuality: Whatever your impulses are, don’t engage in homosexual sex. In fact, don’t have any sex at all unless it is between a husband and wife.” —Ann Coulter
