Tasering the "protester" is a horrible crime apparently, but spiking trees to threaten lumberjacks with bodily injury is some how justifiable. The intellectual, uh, dexterity there is just amazing.
That's what I thought, as well.
Batons ,nets, pepper,wrestleing moves all have some chance for causeing injury , I think the tazer is not any worse in this respect than the alternatives availible.
I'm all for anything that stops the bad guys. If they get hurt, well, they took their chances. They'll learn the same lesson this punk did - your choices have repercussions, and sometimes they hurt.
Tasering a student is a violation of free speech. Free speech is protected by the Constitution.
Not when he purposely violates the rules of the forum he is ranting in, then refuses to stop.
The lumberjack, I point out, CHOOSES to use a chainsaw, or is ordered to do so by his employer.
The nitwit in question, I point out, CHOSE to resist and try to continue on.