What crazy ideas

[Xavier_Onassis]

This really is the best you people can come up with? He's stupid? Reagan is stupid ... was Bush 41 stupid or just a wimp? ... O'Reilly is stupid, Bush is stupid, Thomas is stupid ... yada yada yada.

Reagan is deceased, but when he was alive and only semi-affected with Altzheimers, he was not stupid, he was ignorant. He didn't know squat, and had every cue written on those index cards. He was utterly lost without his notes.

Olebush was a wimp, but also a member of the oligarchy and a connaiver. His job was to manipulate the resources of the middle class and the huge gains from productivity into the oligarchy's pockets.

Thomas is none to bright, and jeez, he still has this obsessive grudge over his appointment after 16 years? He has the cushiest, most secure kjob any Black man has even held in this country and he just sits there on his bench and says nothing and writes less, aping Scalia and Alioto, in a monkey see, monkey do sort of way.

Juniorbush is a failed attempt at resurrecting the stinking corpse of Reagan. He is oired for sound, and needs no index cards. Like Reagan, he learned nothing at college and relies on what they tell him. His job is to continue the looting of the middle class and for good measure, Iraq as well, but his Iraqi adventure has failed due to the incompetence of those around him: Cheney and the neocons especially. Now Giullani has hired the neocons and they're baaaack.

But they can't win. The country has had enough of imperial adventures, secrecy and fascist laws.

You are just a tired and unneeded shill of these thieves and fools. Observe how you are convincing no one.

[Richpo64]

Well, we know what you are don't we.

But then Carter and Clinton were pure genius. Right?  Oh well, there's not a lick of sense in any of that nonsense, so why bother. History tends to drown out people like you, so we'll just have to wait and see won't we.

Something else, It's obvious that you've never been put in the position to make a speech, but there's this thing called college, and toast masters. Both of them teach you to use index cards when speaking. It's just how it's done. Now people use Teleprompters. Kind of the modern version of index cards.

 

[Plane]

 Doen't it seem as though anyone who doesn't agree with self must be less intelligent than self?

[Mr_Perceptive]

yeah, that O'Reilly guys the problem, not the people who are killing us even now.

=====================================================
Killing US?

Do you still have that frog in your pocket?

How is it that US troops who are forced to lie down for Blackwater goons are not included in your description of "us", when those supposedly killed by evil Iranians are?

O'Reilly is an annoying loudmouthed Irishman. Sort of a Pat Buchanan, but now new and improved, with 50% less intelligence.
So there are two ways that you could bond with O'Reilly to become an "us".
Only one if you are of Hibernian ancestry, though.

I sure wish you would stop threatening us with pictures of nuclear explosions. It makes us want to go shopping.

Figuring you layed down when The Man called, I expected such a response.

However, you DO have a point aobut Blackwater. I thought I would never see such an operation, namely civilians en masse protecting soldiers. Shameful.

If they want to hire them to protect dips, then fine, even though that even sounds a bit farfetched.

[Mr_Perceptive]

The problem you have is being a bit player. Nothing but fringe. But oh such a tough talker .... <chuckle>

That is the best you can muster up? Ad hominem? You're a joke, Rich, and you don't even know it.

In the real world you're laughed at. Which is why I imagine you spend your time in here.

Actually, I'm not. You'd be surprised how responsive people can be to intelligent discourse as opposed to the style of your common offerings here of shallow bravado, juvenile name calling and just plain ol' adult male bovine excrement. In the real world, and that includes here, you're the one at whom people are laughing. You talk big like you expect people to take you seriously, but all your arguments are empty and shallow. That is all you have, and that is why you're a joke.

Actually, I generally find nuggets of truth in Rich's and yours and Tees and even ball-less draft-dodger...Rich fulfills a valuable mission here. Let us not forget that?

[Mr_Perceptive]

This really is the best you people can come up with? He's stupid? Reagan is stupid ... was Bush 41 stupid or just a wimp? ... O'Reilly is stupid, Bush is stupid, Thomas is stupid ... yada yada yada.

Reagan is deceased, but when he was alive and only semi-affected with Altzheimers, he was not stupid, he was ignorant. He didn't know squat, and had every cue written on those index cards. He was utterly lost without his notes.

Olebush was a wimp, but also a member of the oligarchy and a connaiver. His job was to manipulate the resources of the middle class and the huge gains from productivity into the oligarchy's pockets.

Thomas is none to bright, and jeez, he still has this obsessive grudge over his appointment after 16 years? He has the cushiest, most secure kjob any Black man has even held in this country and he just sits there on his bench and says nothing and writes less, aping Scalia and Alioto, in a monkey see, monkey do sort of way.

Juniorbush is a failed attempt at resurrecting the stinking corpse of Reagan. He is oired for sound, and needs no index cards. Like Reagan, he learned nothing at college and relies on what they tell him. His job is to continue the looting of the middle class and for good measure, Iraq as well, but his Iraqi adventure has failed due to the incompetence of those around him: Cheney and the neocons especially. Now Giullani has hired the neocons and they're baaaack.

But they can't win. The country has had enough of imperial adventures, secrecy and fascist laws.

You are just a tired and unneeded shill of these thieves and fools. Observe how you are convincing no one.

Got any other conservatives you want to hammer? Surely someone as narcisstically bright as you can come up with others. Don't forget Gonzales, Gingrich, every Republicna running for the Presidency...

[Mr_Perceptive]

Well, we know what you are don't we.

But then Carter and Clinton were pure genius. Right?  Oh well, there's not a lick of sense in any of that nonsense, so why bother. History tends to drown out people like you, so we'll just have to wait and see won't we.

Something else, It's obvious that you've never been put in the position to make a speech, but there's this thing called college, and toast masters. Both of them teach you to use index cards when speaking. It's just how it's done. Now people use Teleprompters. Kind of the modern version of index cards.

 

Actually, I found Reagan to be brighter than expected, Carter to be a true gentleman in every sense of the word and also bright, and Clinton, a Rhodes scholar, to be extremely perceptive. I have not necessarily agreed with their policies but they are still bright individuals. And I would classify all as leader types.