>>Meaning that the Armenian Genocide is just propaganda. After all, Congress are just traitors, we'd better appease Turkey.<<
That's a bit of a stretch, isn't it?
Congress had 100 years to comment on this. Why didn't they do it in 1977? We all know why, because to do so would have damaged Americas relations with Turkey. In 1977 Democrats actually cared about America. Today anything that hurts the president and the troops is fair game. If it isn't treason, what is?
There are 40 states in the United States that recognize the Armenian Genocide and you are completely incorrect about Congress introducing a resolution for recognizing the Armenian Genocide. It has been attempted many times before.
Congressman George Radanovich (R-CA) and Minority Whip David Bonior (D-MI) introduced a resolution in 2000, while Clinton was President.
LinkAnd here is a statement made by President Bush on his campaign trail in 2000:
The twentieth century was marred by wars of unimaginable brutality, mass murder and genocide. History records that the Armenians were the first people of the last century to have endured these cruelties. The Armenians were subjected to a genocidal campaign that defies comprehension and commands all decent people to remember and acknowledge the facts and lessons of an awful crime in a century of bloody crimes against humanity. If elected President, I would ensure that our nation properly recognizes the tragic suffering of the Armenian people.
LinkAnd just for kicks, here is a lovely response by then Foreign Minister Shimon Peres of Israel:
We reject attempts to create a similarity between the Holocaust and the Armenian allegations. Nothing similar to the Holocaust occurred. It is a tragedy what the Armenians went through but not a genocide.
By the way, the Armenians weren't the only people singled out by the Turks. Much like the Jews in the Holocaust, they were the major ethnic and religious group to suffer from the genocide. Yet, the Greeks and Assyrians in Turkey were also systematically destroyed. Governor Pataki (also a Republican last time I checked) made an eloquent speech on that very point and condemned the actions of Turkey during the genocide as well.
This is not something new. I think instead of being frightened by Turkey's response, we ought to ask why Turkey is so melodramatic in her response to a non-binding, simple resolution?