It is fascinating how often you turn on the anti-Christinaity spigot, Crane. The article did not say ANYTHING about either Christianity or racism. Knickers in an uproar perpetually on this issue or what?
Have I offended thee, brother?
By my lights, the cost per pound of sanctimony these days prohibits me from any further indulgence in demanded prostrations.
That means . . . no apology.
Great big ole wounded Goody Two, once again.
I weary of the ennui born of the denials made by agenda-ridden Righters pimp-slapping me with their Bible, and wonder why others in here do not.
If you seek to control posts until they meet your rather anti-intellectual, sentimental notion of just what can and cannot be said of Chrisitianity, you will have to look beyond me.
Santimony aside, I see not the slightest reason to pretend that I should spare "Chrisitianity" in the theatre of political debate, or grant to it any special amelioration whatsoever.
I certainly will not fawn at the fount of what I consider to be spurious, demanded sentimentalities.
I consider my suspension of emotional play a rather sane assuming, because I believe that the Christian Right has demonstrated too numerously to deny their involvement in American politics, and in the relative history of it all, all of a sudden involvement.
That inactivates their 'get out of jail free' card, deferentially speaking.
As they say in the White House, "She's fair game."
BTW, what is the connection between Blackwater and the Christian Right?
Seriously, tell me what is the connection between Blackwater and the Christian Right?
Is that question . . . . . . permitted??? . . . . or is it just too much for the cuckles?