<< . . . after simply posting a tragic casualty of war, as if THAT was some form of atrocity validation. Your movement, not mine.>>
Actually, what I posted was a link to a page with one photo and multiple links. YOU chose to focus on the first photo as if that were the only "atrocity" photo in the collection, although the links were clearly labelled as to content, including child victims, etc., which were, strictly speaking, the REAL Amerikkkan war crimes and atrocities. There was no shortage of atrocity photo links, all clearly labelled as such, which you deliberately chose to avoid in order to attack the first photo on the page. All I did was respond to your attack on that photo by pointing out the fact that ANY casualty of a war is the fault of those who started the war.
<<Which, for all to see, was what the picture was supposed to substantiate>>
No, it's what the LINK was supposed to validate. The link, as I said, led to many clearly-labelled collections of photos of various Amerikkkan war crimes and atrocities, including children, civilians, torture, Abu Ghraib, etc., etc., all of which you studiously chose to ignore in order to create the phony impression that the first photo on the page, rather than any of the clearly-labelled links, was the ONLY evidence of the victims of Amerikkkan atrocities, and as such was clearly inadequate.
<<Casualties of war does not equate to atrocity, no matter how repetative you are with the moronic cries of an illegal war>>
Civilian casualties of war, victims of napalm and/or white phosphorus, are definitely atrocities, as are children, etc., and in a war of unjustified aggression, any civilian casualty is the victim of a war crime because the war of aggression itself is a war crime. Several of the Nuremburg defendants went to the gallows specifically for the crime of plotting and waging a war of unjustified aggression.
<<It's very much like what Pooch accurately referenced ".... is that your perspective is so skewed as to be completely unreliable">>
LOL. Nothing at all wrong with MY perspective. It's your own inability, and Pooch's, to accept the obvious, that is the problem here. There is certainly no shortage of individuals in the world, and even in Amerikkka itself, who accept the obvious and share my perspective entirely. I sure as hell didn't invent it out of whole cloth. To me it's the only logical way of accounting for the events that we all have seen unfold. You and Pooch have found a different way of rationalizing them. Good for you, but don't expect me to agree with your ridiculous nonsense.
