With nothing more than nine-year-old gossip from shadowy, unnamed sources, the New York Times last night journalistically assaulted Senator John McCain, whom they endorsed for President, with a 3,000 word attempt to create out of whole cloth an improper sexual relationship between McCain and lobbyist Vicki Iseman.
===================================
Let's get this straight...they ENDORSED him,and then they ran this story? This story is ancient. They must have been doing him a real favor by doodling around and printing nothing about this for so many years.
McCain did know this woman, so it is not of the "whole cloth", since the fact that he knew her and they hung out for a while is at least a small piece of said metaphorical cloth. If Obama or Hillary had similar encounters with lobbyists of the opposite sex, they'd have printed that too.
At least they did not spread the word around that McCain had a Black love child from some affair with a Black woman as Rove did in 2000. The NY Times is less reprehensible than Juniorbush, then.