Hillary - Obama....Obama - Hillary

[Xavier_Onassis]

I do not believe the figures for campaign contributions are accurate at all. The Oligarchy has ways of getting money to their candidates without reporting it.

And yeah, Scalia and his pals are really on your side. Look at any case involving banks and credit cards. Or anything else that really concerns you personally. Hint: someone else's abortions and gay marriages do not concern you personally.

[Rich]

>>Wow, he has my vote then <<

If for no other reason. But I'm still not sure what I'm going to do.

[sirs]

I do not believe the figures for campaign contributions are accurate at all.

But of course....it goes against what is, is.  How convenient.  Ironically, if it did validate your claims, you'd be preaching it as the gospel truth, because the figures say so

And yeah, Scalia and his pals are really on your side.

Yea, like Imminent Domain.  Oh wait, it was the Liberal wing of the court that passed that thru.  Abortion, oh yea, Liberal wing passed that one too. 

Hint: Innocent lives mean something to me

[Xavier_Onassis]

Go adopt a bushel of innocent lives, then.

[R.R.]

By saving the maximum in my retirement and Roth IRA's and investing in a variety of mutual funds.

How did Bill Clinton cause those mutual funds to go up? Did you pick them or did he?

Weren't you bragging recently about all of the oodles of money you have made over the past five years investing in commerical real estate TIAA-CREF funds, while Bush has been president? 

It's the past Republican congress that is responsible for you to increase the amounts of money you can invest into IRAs.

[Xavier_Onassis]

The Republican congress has raised the amount one can put in an IRS by $3000 per year. The Democrats voted for this, too.

As for the amount that I can put in TIAA-CREF Real estate funds, this was set as a percentage of income, and that has not changed.

What is most important is the business climate during the Clinton years that allowed me to earn 15-25% annually. This is far more important than the maximum deposits.

Naturally I picked the funds, with a lot of good advice that I got from a newsletter I subscribe to.

The Olebush and Juniorbush years resulted in less appreciation in the good years and a three losing years, 1991, 2001, 2002                                                                                     

[Christians4LessGvt]

Taxes under Clinton 1999 vs. Taxes under Bush 2008
 
Taxes under  Clinton  1999                Taxes under Bush 2008


Single making 30K - tax $8,400           Single making 30K - tax $4,500

 

Single making 50K - tax $14,000         Single making 50K - tax $12,500

 

Single making 75K - tax $23,250         Single making 75K - tax $18,750

 

Married making 60K - tax $16,800       Married making 60K- tax $9,000

 

Married making 75K - tax $21,000       Married making 75K - tax $18,750

 

Married making 125K - tax $38,750     Married making 125K - tax $31,250

If you want to know just how effective the mainstream media is, it is amazing how many people that fall into the categories above think Bush is screwing them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President ever.  If any democrat is elected, ALL of them say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen.  This is like the movie The Sting with Paul Newman; you scam somebody out of some money and they don't even know what happened.


If you think it the above may be fabricated, click on the link:
www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html

[Rich]

Aah CU4 ... Those pesky facts always seem to shut them up.

Class warefare fuels the left on the subject of taxes. I'm willing to bet 9 out of ten democrats have no idea what resinding the Bush tax cuts would cost them.

I'd like to see their faces when they get their first pay check during the Obama/Clinton administration.