Let me spell it out for a guy that thinks he's the smartest guy in the world. All this talk of Obama's mother & father is as relevant as bringing Palin's family into the discussion. Now do you get it you stupid old fuck?
My point is to point out just how stupid you and your ilk are with all this irrelevant dirt you are throwing around on Palin. I thought you were supposed to be intelligent. You mean to tell me that you can't connect simple illustrious dots? My gosh can't you read a fucking road map? How much clearer do I have to be?
=========================================
You are not clear at all, other than in the sense that you are making it clear you are a fool in full harlequin garb, complete with a fool's cap with lotsa jinglies on it.
At no point did Obama present his parents as some sort of typical American family. He only told of how he has come to be different from both most American Black and American White men.
Palin is presented as a "Hockey Mom", not a "small town mayor", not as "an anti-corruption Alaska Governor". She is a mom with what most Americans would call a larger than normal number of kids. American women are all aware that the number of children they have is a matter of their own choosing: not God's, not any church's, not even their husband.
So after she is presented as some sort of SuperMom, then it is unfair to suggest that some of her mothering skills have proven less than Super? She supports only abstinence for women prior to marriage, even though about 85% of all All American women have sex before marriage. We even have a TV series about it: "Sex and the City", and this abstinence technique has not worked with her daughter, the evidence being that her daughter have become knocked up. So abstinence has not worked for her daughter, barring the possibility of virgin birth.
And somehow, for you, it IS fair to present Palin as a perfect mother, but unfair to indicate that the evidence proves otherwise. Did Chelsea Clinton get knocked up at the age of 17? How about the Juniorbush girls?