Author Topic: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"  (Read 7837 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2008, 10:41:05 PM »
Turns out that Alaska gets enough from oil that it can pay all the bills and have money left that it divvies up to the citizens. Doesn't make it socialism.

======================
Desn't make it NOT Socialism, either.


Seems close.


What would Joe the Plumber say?

I think Joe the Plumber is a poor choice of an expert to ask about what is or is not socialism.  Joe Biden probably could tell you, but he might not do so at the moment.


Norway provides all manner of services for its citizens from its extensive oil deposits and hydroelectric projects, and makes no bones about being socialist.



"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #16 on: October 28, 2008, 10:45:26 PM »
Turns out that Alaska gets enough from oil that it can pay all the bills and have money left that it divvies up to the citizens. Doesn't make it socialism.

======================
Desn't make it NOT Socialism, either.


Seems close.


What would Joe the Plumber say?

I think Joe the Plumber is a poor choice of an expert to ask about what is or is not socialism.  Joe Biden probably could tell you, but he might not do so at the moment.


Norway provides all manner of services for its citizens from its extensive oil deposits and hydroelectric projects, and makes no bones about being socialist.





Joe the Plumber is a better man to ask  because Joe the Seantor just got his knuckles spanked for speaking a true thing or two. He cannot stand to hear the word "Marx" and cannot say that BHO isn't Marxist.

Woul dyu ask someone who is invested so much in telling you something that isn't so?

Xavier_Onassis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27916
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #17 on: October 28, 2008, 11:26:24 PM »
Obama is not a socialist by any standard definition of the word. Progressive taxes are universal in the developed world. You might call him a Keynesian, though. Richard Nixon owned up to being a Keynesian.

Marx said nothing about progressive taxes. Marx was a radical reformer, who wanted the means of production to belong to the state. If the state owns the means of production, there need be no taxes.

Marx wanted rule to be by a cadre of loyal ideologues, not by democratic vote of everyone.

YOu really do not know what Marxism is. I suspect you have Karl confused with Harpo, Zeppo, Gummo, and Groucho.
"Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana."

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2008, 02:24:54 PM »
So, there is nothing even socialist in nature about this setup?

No. It's more like capitalism. Consider me a shareholder in "State of Minnesota, Inc." and that entitles me to a portion of the profits. Not much different.

A SHAREHOLDER IN THE STATE?????  THAT'S FREAKING SOCIALISM!!!!

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2008, 04:10:42 PM »
So, there is nothing even socialist in nature about this setup?

No. It's more like capitalism. Consider me a shareholder in "State of Minnesota, Inc." and that entitles me to a portion of the profits. Not much different.

A SHAREHOLDER IN THE STATE?????  THAT'S FREAKING SOCIALISM!!!!

So what is a shareholder in a corporation?

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2008, 04:12:44 PM »
So what is a shareholder in a corporation?

A capitalist.

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2008, 04:15:21 PM »
What sort of dividends did Minnesota pay out to shareholders last quarter?

They don't have to pay it out if the income reduces the tax burden. Paying less in taxes is the same as paying more and getting a check back. It's been a few years since they sent out rebates to Minnesota tax payers, but it has happened a number of times. The state is required by law to refund any budget surpluses to the taxpayers.

Turns out that Alaska gets enough from oil that it can pay all the bills and have money left that it divvies up to the citizens. Doesn't make it socialism.

so?cial?ism
? ?/?so????l?z?m/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [soh-shuh-liz-uhm] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1.    a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
2.    procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3.    (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #22 on: October 29, 2008, 04:18:27 PM »
[3.    (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.


The stage that follows the perfection of colectivist principals is known as "famine".

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #23 on: October 29, 2008, 04:50:03 PM »
[3.    (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.


The stage that follows the perfection of colectivist principals is known as "famine".

I can't recall any states that perfected collectivist principles.  Can you name one?

China is doing pretty good at it but they still haven't perfected it.

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #24 on: October 30, 2008, 02:09:50 AM »
[3.    (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.


The stage that follows the perfection of collectivist principals is known as "famine".

I can't recall any states that perfected collectivist principles.  Can you name one?

China is doing pretty good at it but they still haven't perfected it.

China during its record setting famines , Cambodia during its "killing fields "Of course these perfected collectivisms were not preserved long , they were killing too many , there were soon going to be too few left to do the work.

Getting further from collectivisation has improved the situation of China a lot , now if only they could embrace also individual dignity and rights they would be completely removed from perfect collectivization.

Cynthia

  • Guest
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #25 on: October 30, 2008, 02:23:37 AM »
Obama is not a socialist by any standard definition of the word. Progressive taxes are universal in the developed world. You might call him a Keynesian, though. Richard Nixon owned up to being a Keynesian.

Marx said nothing about progressive taxes. Marx was a radical reformer, who wanted the means of production to belong to the state. If the state owns the means of production, there need be no taxes.

Marx wanted rule to be by a cadre of loyal ideologues, not by democratic vote of everyone.

YOu really do not know what Marxism is. I suspect you have Karl confused with Harpo, Zeppo, Gummo, and Groucho.

Xavier,

As I read through this entire thread, I come to wonder.....

Wouldn't you like to see socialism in this country? Why so defensive?
What's wrong with supporting such a thing?

Be honest.
Cindy

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #26 on: October 30, 2008, 04:50:39 AM »
If the state owns the means of production, there need be no taxes.



A very high tax rate is thereby socialist .

A 100% tax rate that put everyone on the dole would acheive socialism , would n't it?

So any tax above the mere need of the government is a step in that direction.

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #27 on: October 30, 2008, 12:10:31 PM »
Xavier,

As I read through this entire thread, I come to wonder.....

Wouldn't you like to see socialism in this country? Why so defensive?
What's wrong with supporting such a thing?

Be honest.
Cindy

Cindy,

Don't know if this is a shrewd post on your part or just an honest question.

I can't speak for XO, but for me, socialism is part and parcel of the American way of life.  Of late, it has been in decline as right-wing ideologues have fought to "starve the beast" in hopes of being allowed to set the rules as far as what is fair and what isn't.  They would like to see capitalism unfettered and running amok THAT IS UNTIL they utterly fail and want to see some socialism in the form of bailouts.  Then they are all about how everything is connected and if the banks go under EVERYONE goes under.

Personally, I believe that we need some socialism put back in our way of life along the lines of the New Deal and the Great Society but I don't believe for a second that is Barack Obama's intent.

I do, however, believe that Hannity, Limbaugh and their followers would LOVE to hear Obama, his surrogates and a lot of his supporters say something along the lines of, "HELL YES, WE'RE SOCIALISTS!!!  WHAT ARE YOU GONNA DO ABOUT IT???" especially before the weekend so people can stew on it.

But that just ain't gonna happen.

Brass

Cynthia

  • Guest
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #28 on: October 30, 2008, 01:06:26 PM »
Xavier,

As I read through this entire thread, I come to wonder.....

Wouldn't you like to see socialism in this country? Why so defensive?
What's wrong with supporting such a thing?

Be honest.
Cindy

Cindy,

Don't know if this is a shrewd post on your part or just an honest question.

I can't speak for XO, but for me, socialism is part and parcel of the American way of life.  Of late, it has been in decline as right-wing ideologues have fought to "starve the beast" in hopes of being allowed to set the rules as far as what is fair and what isn't.  They would like to see capitalism unfettered and running amok THAT IS UNTIL they utterly fail and want to see some socialism in the form of bailouts.  Then they are all about how everything is connected and if the banks go under EVERYONE goes under.

Personally, I believe that we need some socialism put back in our way of life along the lines of the New Deal and the Great Society but I don't believe for a second that is Barack Obama's intent.

I do, however, believe that Hannity, Limbaugh and their followers would LOVE to hear Obama, his surrogates and a lot of his supporters say something along the lines of, "HELL YES, WE'RE SOCIALISTS!!!  WHAT ARE YOU GONNA DO ABOUT IT???" especially before the weekend so people can stew on it.

But that just ain't gonna happen.

Brass

Brassie,

Thank you for your response. I was, indeed asking Xavier for his honest take on the idea of American Socialism in this time.

I was raised listening to the fear factor of socialism ( the generation of my father-a right wing father)...thus, I feel it appropriate at this time to inquire within. The details offered here on the board give me food for thought, and I find it refreshing to learn about the truth of socialism according to folks like you.

I do worry that Americans will turn into a culture of ---if it aint workin' throw that sucker out with the muddy bath water--mentality.

There can't be a complete perfection point in any "ism"....

Can there not be a more workable system with a consolidation of effort?
« Last Edit: October 30, 2008, 01:09:26 PM by Cindy »

Brassmask

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2600
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Yep, Palin Believes in "Shar[ing] The Wealth"
« Reply #29 on: October 30, 2008, 03:22:50 PM »
Brassie,

Thank you for your response. I was, indeed asking Xavier for his honest take on the idea of American Socialism in this time.

I was raised listening to the fear factor of socialism ( the generation of my father-a right wing father)...thus, I feel it appropriate at this time to inquire within. The details offered here on the board give me food for thought, and I find it refreshing to learn about the truth of socialism according to folks like you.

I do worry that Americans will turn into a culture of ---if it aint workin' throw that sucker out with the muddy bath water--mentality.

There can't be a complete perfection point in any "ism"....

Can there not be a more workable system with a consolidation of effort?

Cindy,

I think there most definitely can be a workable consolidated system if all the parties involved are willing to relinquish some of their ideological tenets for the better good.  More on that in a minute.

Were you around several years ago when I was constantly trying to convince everyone in 3DHS that we should embrace an RBE (resource-based economy)?  Seriously?  I dedicated several months of my 3DHS airtime to constantly trying to tweak it, massage it, better explain it, modify it in any way I could to accommodate as many of the complaints about political and economic system that came to be known (often mockingly) as the RBE in here.

Perhaps I was obsessed (hard-harded, a true-believer, idealistic, whatever) with the idea but that's just me.  I wanted it to work because I loved the whole idea but no matter what I said, how I posited it, no matter how many questions I asked of everyone here (and others no longer here), I was always shot down, dismissed and never ONCE, not ONCE, Cindy, did one person every attempt to discuss the idea with me in any constructive manner because it was "socialism" or "communism".

Eventually, in order to find some kind of common ground, I altered the economic concept to be a blend of capitalism and socialism.  I tentatively called it a Brass Economy because brass is actually an alloy of copper and zinc, a blend if you will.  Again, the idea never got any traction because everyone was so reticent to discuss anything that had anything to do with socialism.

I've drawn parallel after parallel with these two systems with the current system we actually live with every day but those parallels were never even discussed or debated beyond, "you're a moron" or "you don't know how the world works" or "that's socialism".

Ironically, I often stated that the only way that people might be open to a more socialist point of view is if we have a large scale financial meltdown (something like a total market crash).

Now, here we are.  Meltdown city.  And though almost everyone here was against the bailout, it appears that the nation is moving to being a little easier with the idea of socialism.  That is indicated by the way Obama continues to lead in polls while McCain and Palin and all surrogates are screaming that he is a socialist at every opportunity.

Brass