Author Topic: Songbird - a devastating account of McCain's real-life incarceration . . .  (Read 8685 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
<<Ahh, But, Michael.....those  [S.S. troopers, Japs at the Rape of Nanking] men WERE heros in Hitler's army. >>

Are they heroes to you?  Should they be heroes to your students?  Would you tell your students that they were heroes to anyone other than their families or Adolf Hitler?

What do you think is the worth of being a hero to your family or your leader?  Isn't there a broader audience of people to whom one must be a hero before he or she can be truthfully described as a "hero?"

<<.... but those young men who went to war were INDEED heros in the eyes of their loved ones. Any person who fights a war under the proper conventions, is a hero.>>

What if they fight a war "under the proper conventions" but then commit atrocities against the occupied civilian population?  Are they still heroes?

<<Murdering and flying planes into buildings does not count as fighting for a nation under such circumstances. ..THUS they are murdering others based on their own selfish "cause".>>

What if they were soldiers of a nation rather than a bunch of religious fanatics and were ordered to hijack planes and fly them into buildings by their duly appointed military superior officers in their national army?  Would that change them from murderers to heroes?


<<We disagree on this issue, Mtee.>>

Then one of us has to be wrong.  And I'm particularly concerned about this because I know you're a teacher.  Some of the opinions I see in here in this group (a classic being that "this nation was founded on conservative principles") really give me the willies when I think of what kind of things American students are learning in their schools.  I really do think it is crucially important that teachers have a good grasp of what is right and what is wrong.  What is truly heroic (IMHO, Rosa Parks is a greater hero than John McCain or any other napalm-dropping murderer of helpless civilians could ever be) and what is not.


Cynthia

  • Guest
  Re: Songbird - a devastating account of McCain's real-life incarceration . . .
« Reply #15 on: Today at 01:39:42 PM » Quote 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<<Ahh, But, Michael.....those  [S.S. troopers, Japs at the Rape of Nanking] men WERE heros in Hitler's army. >>

Are they heroes to you?  Should they be heroes to your students?  Would you tell your students that they were heroes to anyone other than their families or Adolf Hitler?

They are heros to me. I don't discuss such issues with my students. That's not my job.

What do you think is the worth of being a hero to your family or your leader? 


I believe that any individual who fights for his/her country, no matter if I believe in that fight or not,is a hero.
In fact, "FAMILY" can mean something quite different to a soldier in battle. The individual in the foxhole, or crouched behind the torn down adobe style building, or walking down a dirty, dusty road to Baghdad actually considers his fellow soldier/buddy to be FAMILY!  There is a sense of band of brother mentality...as they are fighting together for the same cause. No matter how much YOU DON'T want to believe that, Michael.


In this case, Bush's cause to invade Iraq was wrong, sure, a lot of us can sit here and agree to that. But that's not the fault of the soldier. Military has a job description....and if that person signs up for a job and does it as best as he/she can do, especially if it is a dangerous job of defending one's country THAT constitutes  a hero in my opinion.
 
Isn't there a broader audience of people to whom one must be a hero before he or she can be truthfully described as a "hero?"

 A hero can be defined by the individual, or a broader audience. I define "hero" with a deep respect for the unselfishness of that individual who has taken on a job especially for another person's benefit, willing to do so no matter the broader audience's view

Respect for a soldier..yep I have that, unconditionally.....not to mention the fact that the individual is putting his/her life on the line.


<<.... but those young men who went to war were INDEED heros in the eyes of their loved ones. Any person who fights a war under the proper conventions, is a hero.>>

What if they fight a war "under the proper conventions" but then commit atrocities against the occupied civilian population?  Are they still heroes?

Those are criminals, and they are not heros in my mind. There are criminal factors in any given war. Raping of innocents etc. OF course not, Mtee.

<<Murdering and flying planes into buildings does not count as fighting for a nation under such circumstances. ..THUS they are murdering others based on their own selfish "cause".>>

What if they were soldiers of a nation rather than a bunch of religious fanatics and were ordered to hijack planes and fly them into buildings by their duly appointed military superior officers in their national army?  Would that change them from murderers to heroes?


 If the bunch of religious fanatics were ordered to disobey any sort of rules of war based on something like the Geneva Convention...then sure, they would not be a hero.




<<We disagree on this issue, Mtee.>>

Then one of us has to be wrong.  And I'm particularly concerned about this because I know you're a teacher.  Some of the opinions I see in here in this group (a classic being that "this nation was founded on conservative principles") really give me the willies when I think of what kind of things American students are learning in their schools.  I really do think it is crucially important that teachers have a good grasp of what is right and what is wrong.  What is truly heroic (IMHO, Rosa Parks is a greater hero than John McCain or any other napalm-dropping murderer of helpless civilians could ever be) and what is not.


Well, don't be concerned, Mtee. I do not teach war to my students! ha! I do not talk about my own personal beliefs in this regard AT ALL to my students.
So, your attempt to pull the "shame on you" approach is not going to hold water with me, Mtee..


McCain was a hero for running for president. I am a hero to my students. Hero can be defined differently to each person.

You tend to rant and try to create a sense of shame against America. That's what I constantly read here, Mtee.


 
« Last Edit: November 01, 2008, 03:57:59 PM by Cindy »

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
<<You tend to rant and try to create a sense of shame against America. That's what I constantly read here, Mtee.>>

Well, I'm sorry about the ranting, I try to keep it logical and concise, but you're right, it often does degenerate into "ranting" and I gotta watch that.

I believe that America has done and is still doing some very shameful acts, but what bugs me most of all is not the shameful acts themselves but the total lack of shame on the part of many contributors to this group.  Of course, most Americans - - and certainly the ones I know or have met personally - - are in fact deeply ashamed of the actions of their country, but in this group, I guess what is the most appalling thing to confront is the bare-faced shamelessness of so many, mostly with deep connections to the South, and my efforts described by you as "trying to create a sense of shame against America" are, from my own POV, just a challenge to their shamelessness.  It's a hard thing NOT to confront, IMHO.

BTW, I'd like to thank you for answering the questions I put to you so thoughtfully and honestly.  It's too bad we don't agree, but at least I have a good window into your way of thinking, and I thank you for it.

PS - Regarding your not discussing these issues with your students - - I went to what was generally regarded as the best public high school in the City of Toronto and its suburbs at the time, including its junior high school, where many of our teachers were well-educated veterans of the Second World War, almost all with Master's Degrees in the subjects they taught.  These were men (and one woman) who really understood what they had been  fighting for, and I still remember a talk that our Grade 8 history teacher gave us on academic freedom and something that our Grade 10 to 13 French teacher said about the brotherhood of man.  I credit those teachers (and my dad) with the instillation of unshakeable liberal values in me (all of them, BTW, firmly opposed to communism in principle, but equally opposed to knee-jerk anti-communism of the McCarthy type) and I'm always grateful to them for instilling such values in me and my class-mates but also for allowing and encouraging us to question and challenge them so freely.  I don't see the harm in a teacher allowing her students to know where she stands on an issue if the issue comes up in the normal course of a curriculum-related subject.  (Although I can see how your "Nazis are heroes too" POV could land you in a lot of hot water up this way.)
« Last Edit: November 01, 2008, 04:23:31 PM by Michael Tee »

BSB

  • Guest
Re 3

Hey Lanya.

BSB

  • Guest
Michael: "Then one of us has to be wrong."

Why is that?


Cynthia

  • Guest
<<You tend to rant and try to create a sense of shame against America. That's what I constantly read here, Mtee.>>

Well, I'm sorry about the ranting, I try to keep it logical and concise, but you're right, it often does degenerate into "ranting" and I gotta watch that.

I believe that America has done and is still doing some very shameful acts, but what bugs me most of all is not the shameful acts themselves but the total lack of shame on the part of many contributors to this group.  Of course, most Americans - - and certainly the ones I know or have met personally - - are in fact deeply ashamed of the actions of their country, but in this group, I guess what is the most appalling thing to confront is the bare-faced shamelessness of so many, mostly with deep connections to the South, and my efforts described by you as "trying to create a sense of shame against America" are, from my own POV, just a challenge to their shamelessness.  It's a hard thing NOT to confront, IMHO.

BTW, I'd like to thank you for answering the questions I put to you so thoughtfully and honestly.  It's too bad we don't agree, but at least I have a good window into your way of thinking, and I thank you for it.

PS - Regarding your not discussing these issues with your students - - I went to what was generally regarded as the best public high school in the City of Toronto and its suburbs at the time, including its junior high school, where many of our teachers were well-educated veterans of the Second World War, almost all with Master's Degrees in the subjects they taught.  These were men (and one woman) who really understood what they had been  fighting for, and I still remember a talk that our Grade 8 history teacher gave us on academic freedom and something that our Grade 10 to 13 French teacher said about the brotherhood of man.  I credit those teachers (and my dad) with the instillation of unshakeable liberal values in me (all of them, BTW, firmly opposed to communism in principle, but equally opposed to knee-jerk anti-communism of the McCarthy type) and I'm always grateful to them for instilling such values in me and my class-mates but also for allowing and encouraging us to question and challenge them so freely.  I don't see the harm in a teacher allowing her students to know where she stands on an issue if the issue comes up in the normal course of a curriculum-related subject.  (Although I can see how your "Nazis are heroes too" POV could land you in a lot of hot water up this way.)


Well, where do I begin.

First of all, you are a good egg on here in terms of being a gentleman to me. This is clear. I thank you for that, Michael.  You have the right to your opinion, albeit, as BSB inquired....what the heck did you mean BY THAT statement; ONe of us is wrong?? LOL

That statement did not pass me by. I meant to address that too, but frankly it was so blantantly "typcial of your broad stroke thought process" with all due respect.
I didn't pay it much mind...as they say in the south. (my mama is southern)...

anyway.....

Michael Tee: The accusations you make here sometimes are no different from those "crimes and misdemeanors" that you accuse the US of A of committing. Ex:

"I believe that America has done and is still doing some very shameful acts," but what bugs me most of all is not the shameful acts themselves but the total lack of shame on the part of many contributors to this group".......


Or really? Shameful acts? That's like saying that those idiots who flew into the twin towers represented everyone is Iraq/Afghanistan! That's like saying that one of my students who has an issue with bullying---somehow that represents all of my students! No way.

You tend to broad stroke, dear MTee...you do. My god, man.....we can't even begin to compare Hitler to Bush..as much as you seem to want to do with the way you rant.
 You set up that sort of comparison and the scenario for me in your last post  by bringing up the issue of Hitler....I wasn't expecting THAT...but you jump to such an extreme comparison...my gosh....,dude. you really do.

I would never compare the military in this United State to any group such as Hitler's army. But my darn you brought it up and I am going to address it. So you don't think that the German mother who sent her boy off to war didn't think of him as a hero??
Come on!

Of course, most Americans - - and certainly the ones I know or have met personally - - are in fact deeply ashamed of the actions of their country,


OH REALLY? MOST??? That's laughable, Michael. Again, you jump! Leaping through the air with the greatest of the old rubber necking ease.
That's not an accurate portrayal of anyone, especially AMERICANS.   You need to create a poll...give a few of us a call, and see how the slices comes out. Face it, dear.....face it ... you do want MOST of us to be on the side of your passion....

Ok, of course we all want support. But, to broad stroke the way you do....come on. 

I guess what is the most appalling thing to confront is the bare-faced shamelessness of so many, mostly with deep connections to the South, and my efforts described by you as "trying to create a sense of shame against America" are, from my own POV, just a challenge to their shamelessness.  It's a hard thing NOT to confront, IMHO.

THE SOUTH ...huh? Hmmm, I am a southwesterner...does that count in your bias poll?

South of France, South of Korea.....South Vietnam...now what the hell do you mean?

You are not happy with us, this I can tell.  You make accusations against a broad base of folks in the country and on this board. That does not bode well for your point,however, MTee....honestly.. imho. Make your stance, as Brass does or Xavier...and stop the borderline steaming mad vent towards a nation!!..a NATION.. of folks. If you want to get your point across, keep it simple and on the ground floor level. OFten times, I wonder what is your point. . . But I always come back to a sort of
 disdain for America.
 I also do not agree that we should revisit the time of the early 50's overkill fear of commies....OF course not.

 But, when you told Brass the other day that he should celebrate the new world to come.....ahh, he should perk up..why? Because you believe that our nation is going to end up completely socialist.  You want that. Ok, I am not quick to accept that. I try to listen to the fathers of the past. I give them the benefit of the doubt. I believe radical beliefs in any form are dangerous....as is the right wing religious nuts of this country.

as for my job.....A BIG NO WAY.

I teach 8 year olds.

we'll talk about that issue another day.

Thanks,
Cindy
« Last Edit: November 02, 2008, 12:11:32 AM by Cindy »

Michael Tee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12605
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Cindy:  <<We disagree on this issue, Mtee.>>

[The issue being, is a man who lays his life on the line for  his country a hero or not?]

MT:  <<Then one of us has to be wrong. >>

BSB:  <<Why is that?>>

=========================================================

I was wrong.  "Hero" was never defined to our mutual satisfaction.   According to Cindy's definition of "hero" she could be right, and according to my definition of "hero," I could be right. 

It might be more useful to just admit that McCain is a hero as Cindy defines one.  It is certainly true that he did put his life on the line for his country.  So the question I should have asked Cindy was, what follows from his having put his life on the line for his country?

Should he be elected President?  Is he "entitled?"

I guess what really concerns me is whether a guy who put his life on the line for his country can get too much respect.

BSB

  • Guest
No Michael. I meant, why does someone have to be wrong? Can we get beyond the Old Testament here?

Cynthia

  • Guest
No Michael. I meant, why does someone have to be wrong? Can we get beyond the Old Testament here?


You mean...."you're either "in or yer out"?

Black and White...old testiment mentality. 

I wonder if MTee has in mind that Old Testiment...meant AL-Ity!
;)

« Last Edit: November 02, 2008, 01:52:32 AM by Cindy »

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
No Michael. I meant, why does someone have to be wrong? Can we get beyond the Old Testament here?

Now thare you go picking on the Old Testiment.

Where in there does it say that all games are zero sum?

Cynthia

  • Guest
Cindy:  <<We disagree on this issue, Mtee.>>

[The issue being, is a man who lays his life on the line for  his country a hero or not?]

MT:  <<Then one of us has to be wrong. >>

BSB:  <<Why is that?>>

=========================================================

I was wrong.  "Hero" was never defined to our mutual satisfaction.   According to Cindy's definition of "hero" she could be right, and according to my definition of "hero," I could be right. 

It might be more useful to just admit that McCain is a hero as Cindy defines one.  It is certainly true that he did put his life on the line for his country.  So the question I should have asked Cindy was, what follows from his having put his life on the line for his country?

Should he be elected President?  Is he "entitled?"

I guess what really concerns me is whether a guy who put his life on the line for his country can get too much respect.

So the question I should have asked Cindy was, what follows from his having put his life on the line for his country?

Should he be elected President?  Is he "entitled?"


What do you mean...."What follows"?

Nothing follows....that's just his life. His experience certainly doesn't equate to qualifying as our best leader...my God, clearly, one of Bush's past "ahaa moments" simply reflects that he learned how to fly BIG JEt planes, and he looked hot in his uniform to boot!!



Look, MTee, if a man or woman can manage a country with the best to be offered, then he/she's gunna get the job.

Problem is, our airwaves tend to look at the superficial nature of a human being, instead of the bones and meat within.

So, in a way to go back to the question of educating our youth in that way...

I offer my little students  the choice to "think for themselves" on issues that mean something in their own stage of development.

Those "activites" will transfer to critical thinking and constructive insights into the future. 

But to "brainwash" or convince a child that your way is the "highway" is WRONG.

To do so is not the best practices element of good teaching.

If we were to teach one tiny bit of our belief system to a child, that would be wrong. Really wrong.

TALK ABOUT YOUR HITLER YOUTH?? That's why your definition of hero is askewed there for the German mother.
Not our job as educators, and it really is a tricky area to cross. Trust me on that one.


Ok, I can just see your next point here...Bush has indoctrinated the country with his injections of fear theory???

Not necessarily. We have TOO much freedom in this country, imo. We need to be accountable to what is best for one another instead of what is best for the ME, WE mentality. Global warfare takes on a whole new meaning here.

So, I listen to your thoughts as an intelligent gent from up north....don't get me wrong. I do want to hear more. I do understand some of your points of view.

But, I believe we must not show emotion in any venue of discussion that is so important that we want others to HEAR US OUT.

That's the first thing they teach us in college about educating children...NEVER show your emotional side....I see that now. I didn't before...

again..that's a whole other discussion...for another time.


Ok nite again,

Cindy

« Last Edit: November 02, 2008, 01:33:03 AM by Cindy »

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Quote
We have TOO much freedom in this country, imo. We need to be accountable to what is best for one another instead of what is best for the ME, WE mentality.


Say what?

Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0


So, in a way to go back to the question of educating our youth in that way...

I offer my little students  the choice to "think for themselves" on issues that mean something in their own stage of development.

Those "activites" will transfer to critical thinking and constructive insights into the future. 

But to "brainwash" or convince a child that your way is the "highway" is WRONG.

To do so is not the best practices element of good teaching.

Young minds deserve to learn how to stay open and receptive...,not take in the nearest adults point of view....just because.




Bravo bravo!

Cynthia

  • Guest
Quote
We have TOO much freedom in this country, imo. We need to be accountable to what is best for one another instead of what is best for the ME, WE mentality.


Say what?


In a way we have TOO much freedom, BT.....the scale tips.

We must also teach our kids how to use the freedoms we have so that responsibility becomes more of a key which gracefully unlocks the door to such things as knowledge and spending, and religion.

IN some ways we have TOO MUCH open minded views and those views are lack of knowledge.....in a free state.

I might have mispoke when I said that we HAVE TOO MANY FREEDOMS...so pardon me on that one.

But we must teach children how to care for the other person.

Someone posted a great cartoon recently here......me me me generation..and thee thee thee generation booths.

Giving  to others is not to be underestimated, and should be taught within the home.

Cynthia

  • Guest


So, in a way to go back to the question of educating our youth in that way...

I offer my little students  the choice to "think for themselves" on issues that mean something in their own stage of development.

Those "activites" will transfer to critical thinking and constructive insights into the future. 

But to "brainwash" or convince a child that your way is the "highway" is WRONG.

To do so is not the best practices element of good teaching.

Young minds deserve to learn how to stay open and receptive...,not take in the nearest adults point of view....just because.




Bravo bravo!

Well,thank ya Plane...

But, that's what I do in my job.

I can't speak for the president of this nation.

Frankly, I don't think it should be up to ONE PERSON to run for president of this nation....


We get stuck in an American Idol election of sorts.....

Poignant cartoon brought to us by Ami recently....very poignant.


Cindy