<<Well that is a theroy.>>
Yeah that's right. And if a man invites Jeffrey Dahmer to spend the night baby-sitting his eight-year-old son, and the next morning both Dahmer and the kid are gone, it's also a theory that Dahmer ate him.
It's also a theory that Dahmer just took the kid to see Walt Disney World and will bring him home before dinner time. It's also a theory that the kid ate Jeffrey Dahmer. And it's also a theory that the majority of Iranians voted against Ahmadinejad and are spontaneously rioting out of outrage that their guys officially lost when they got more votes and the CIA and British intelligence just scrupulously avoided interfering in the slightest degree with the elections held in a sovereign country out of a pure and reverent respect for the sovereignty of that country.
There are lots of theories. What is your point?
<<Whereas you agree that the Iranian government is not all that good , why do you consider it impossible that the people of Iran might rise up against it on their own ?>>
Because, as I have already stated, the Washington Post's own poll three weeks in advance of the election showed Ahmadinejad winning by an even bigger majority than was officially counted for him. Because rioting broke out even before the polls closed and because for at least three days following the elections, there were no statments from any of the losing parties just how this massive vote - - in a country of 73 million people - - was actually stolen. It seemed kind of unusual that rioting would break out over a stolen election when nobody seemed to have any idea how a vote that huge could be stolen AND when reputable polls had predicted the result weeks ahead. Because in the two or three days before the election almost a million new cell-phone subscribers were registered in Tehran alone, indicating preparations by the opposition parties to massively protest the "fixing" of elections that had not even at that point been held, let alone "fixed." Because the U.S. and Israel have threatened Iran on countless occasions with regime change, in attempts to get them to back off their nuclear programs, and the appearance of "spontaneous" crowds in the streets, "protesting" something or other that they never gave a shit about previously, is the classic hallmark of CIA regime-change modus operandi.
There are probably a few other good reasons I left out that show why these "protests" are probably not a popular uprising, but these reasons alone are way more than sufficient.
