Author Topic: Justice Clarence Thomas vigorously defended campaign finance decision  (Read 6471 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Universe Prince

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3660
  • Of course liberty isn't safe; but it is good.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Justice Clarence Thomas vigorously defended campaign finance decision
« Reply #30 on: February 05, 2010, 11:21:34 PM »
Right. And the government would never consider making it mandatory. Sure.
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever.
--Hieronymus Karl Frederick Baron von Munchausen ("The Adventures of Baron Munchausen" [1988])--

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Justice Clarence Thomas vigorously defended campaign finance decision
« Reply #31 on: February 05, 2010, 11:28:25 PM »
They might, who knows. But they haven't yet and Presidential Election Campaign Fund has been around in its final form since 1976.

Universe Prince

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3660
  • Of course liberty isn't safe; but it is good.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Justice Clarence Thomas vigorously defended campaign finance decision
« Reply #32 on: February 06, 2010, 12:41:14 AM »
They also haven't eliminated private funding of campaigns yet. I think guessing that would change the situation is a safe guess.
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever.
--Hieronymus Karl Frederick Baron von Munchausen ("The Adventures of Baron Munchausen" [1988])--

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Justice Clarence Thomas vigorously defended campaign finance decision
« Reply #33 on: February 06, 2010, 01:00:59 AM »
Quote
They also haven't eliminated private funding of campaigns yet. I think guessing that would change the situation is a safe guess.

Why?

What do you think it costs to run for local office?

Universe Prince

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3660
  • Of course liberty isn't safe; but it is good.
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Justice Clarence Thomas vigorously defended campaign finance decision
« Reply #34 on: February 06, 2010, 01:20:25 AM »
I haven't the foggiest. Are you suggesting the federal government would handle financing for local politics?
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever.
--Hieronymus Karl Frederick Baron von Munchausen ("The Adventures of Baron Munchausen" [1988])--

BT

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16141
    • View Profile
    • DebateGate
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 3
Re: Justice Clarence Thomas vigorously defended campaign finance decision
« Reply #35 on: February 06, 2010, 01:42:35 AM »
Quote
Are you suggesting the federal government would handle financing for local politics?

I think local governments could handle that. Same check-box different tax.

But just to clear the fog, my filing fees were higher than my campaign expense.


Plane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26993
    • View Profile
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Justice Clarence Thomas vigorously defended campaign finance decision
« Reply #36 on: February 06, 2010, 06:31:27 AM »
In 2008 the advrage spent by winning congressional campaigns was 1.4 million.


Small in comparison to laundry soap or hamburgurs.