Now you're just trying to manipulate semantics. The position is clear despite you're trying to muddy it up
Nope, the inference that there is a big box that is communally owned by everyone is not semantics. If everyone owns this big box, then everyone is free to use any part of this big box - which means use of the little boxes, since that is all that exists in this big box.
I think that we should refer to the Preamble , where Congress gives voice to the entity "We the People of the United States of America".
We the people are an abstract entity , is it oximoronic to call an abstract real?
I think it real , and the Constitution is a tool of the people for the establishment of a government.
Altho it looks like something real when there is a fence built on it , a border is also an abstraction anything that hasn't got a human understanding has a hard time detecting a national border.
So "the people " is a real abstraction , which produced the constitution and government , which are real abstractions and which establish and own the national border which is a real abstraction.
The accident of which side of a border one is born on has very profound effect on the way human beings live their lives , we the people of the planet earth have sliced the planet with borders all over the place , separateing society and society , and economy and economy. Is this longstanding convention of abstractions unessacery?